forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
mm/mprotect.c: don't imply PROT_EXEC on non-exec fs
The mprotect(PROT_READ) fails when called by the READ_IMPLIES_EXEC binary on a memory mapped file located on non-exec fs. The mprotect does not check whether fs is _executable_ or not. The PROT_EXEC flag is set automatically even if a memory mapped file is located on non-exec fs. Fix it by checking whether a memory mapped file is located on a non-exec fs. If so the PROT_EXEC is not implied by the PROT_READ. The implementation uses the VM_MAYEXEC flag set properly in mmap. Now it is consistent with mmap. I did the isolated tests (PT_GNU_STACK X/NX, multiple VMAs, X/NX fs). I also patched the official 3.19.0-47-generic Ubuntu 14.04 kernel and it seems to work. Signed-off-by: Piotr Kwapulinski <kwapulinski.piotr@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a5f4db8771
commit
f138556daf
|
@ -359,6 +359,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mprotect, unsigned long, start, size_t, len,
|
|||
struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev;
|
||||
int error = -EINVAL;
|
||||
const int grows = prot & (PROT_GROWSDOWN|PROT_GROWSUP);
|
||||
const bool rier = (current->personality & READ_IMPLIES_EXEC) &&
|
||||
(prot & PROT_READ);
|
||||
|
||||
prot &= ~(PROT_GROWSDOWN|PROT_GROWSUP);
|
||||
if (grows == (PROT_GROWSDOWN|PROT_GROWSUP)) /* can't be both */
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
@ -375,11 +378,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mprotect, unsigned long, start, size_t, len,
|
|||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
reqprot = prot;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Does the application expect PROT_READ to imply PROT_EXEC:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((prot & PROT_READ) && (current->personality & READ_IMPLIES_EXEC))
|
||||
prot |= PROT_EXEC;
|
||||
|
||||
down_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -414,6 +412,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mprotect, unsigned long, start, size_t, len,
|
|||
|
||||
/* Here we know that vma->vm_start <= nstart < vma->vm_end. */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Does the application expect PROT_READ to imply PROT_EXEC */
|
||||
if (rier && (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYEXEC))
|
||||
prot |= PROT_EXEC;
|
||||
|
||||
newflags = calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey);
|
||||
newflags |= (vma->vm_flags & ~(VM_READ | VM_WRITE | VM_EXEC));
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -445,6 +447,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mprotect, unsigned long, start, size_t, len,
|
|||
error = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
prot = reqprot;
|
||||
}
|
||||
out:
|
||||
up_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user