forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
x86, kprobes: remove sparse warnings from x86
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c:584:16: warning: symbol 'kretprobe_trampoline_holder' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c:676:6: warning: symbol 'trampoline_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? Make them static and add the __used attribute, approach taken from the arm kprobes implementation. kretprobe_trampoline_holder uses inline assemly to define the global symbol kretprobe_trampoline, but nothing ever calls the holder explicitly. trampoline handler is only called from inline assembly in the same file, mark it used and static. Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
08cd93f9e1
commit
f1452d424d
@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static int __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
* When a retprobed function returns, this code saves registers and
|
||||
* calls trampoline_handler() runs, which calls the kretprobe's handler.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void __kprobes kretprobe_trampoline_holder(void)
|
||||
static void __used __kprobes kretprobe_trampoline_holder(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
asm volatile (
|
||||
".global kretprobe_trampoline\n"
|
||||
@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ void __kprobes kretprobe_trampoline_holder(void)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Called from kretprobe_trampoline
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void * __kprobes trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
static __used __kprobes void *trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct kretprobe_instance *ri = NULL;
|
||||
struct hlist_head *head, empty_rp;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user