tcp: refine tcp_tso_should_defer() after EDT adoption

tcp_tso_should_defer() last step tries to check if the probable
next ACK packet is coming in less than half rtt.

Problem is that the head->tstamp might be in the future,
so we need to use signed arithmetics to avoid overflows.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Dumazet 2018-11-11 06:41:30 -08:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 1c09f7d073
commit f1c6ea3827

View File

@ -1907,10 +1907,11 @@ static bool tcp_tso_should_defer(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
bool *is_cwnd_limited, u32 max_segs)
{
const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
u32 age, send_win, cong_win, limit, in_flight;
u32 send_win, cong_win, limit, in_flight;
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
struct sk_buff *head;
int win_divisor;
s64 delta;
if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags & TCPHDR_FIN)
goto send_now;
@ -1972,9 +1973,9 @@ static bool tcp_tso_should_defer(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
head = tcp_rtx_queue_head(sk);
if (!head)
goto send_now;
age = tcp_stamp_us_delta(tp->tcp_mstamp, tcp_skb_timestamp_us(head));
delta = tp->tcp_clock_cache - head->tstamp;
/* If next ACK is likely to come too late (half srtt), do not defer */
if (age < (tp->srtt_us >> 4))
if ((s64)(delta - (u64)NSEC_PER_USEC * (tp->srtt_us >> 4)) < 0)
goto send_now;
/* Ok, it looks like it is advisable to defer. */