trace_workqueue: remove blank line between each cpu

The blankline between each cpu's workqueue stat is not necessary, because
the cpu number is enough to part them by eye.
Old style also caused a blankline below headline, and made code complex
by using lock, disableirq and get cpu var.

Old style:
 # CPU  INSERTED  EXECUTED   NAME
 # |      |         |          |

   0   8644       8644       events/0
   0      0          0       cpuset
   ...
   0      1          1       kdmflush

   1  35365      35365       events/1
   ...

New style:
 # CPU  INSERTED  EXECUTED   NAME
 # |      |         |          |

   0   8644       8644       events/0
   0      0          0       cpuset
   ...
   0      1          1       kdmflush
   1  35365      35365       events/1
   ...

[ Impact: provide more readable code ]

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Zhaolei 2009-04-20 15:02:17 +08:00 committed by Frederic Weisbecker
parent b8867164f0
commit f3c4ae26e9

View File

@ -185,16 +185,9 @@ static void *workqueue_stat_next(void *prev, int idx)
static int workqueue_stat_show(struct seq_file *s, void *p)
{
struct cpu_workqueue_stats *cws = p;
unsigned long flags;
int cpu = cws->cpu;
struct pid *pid;
struct task_struct *tsk;
spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
if (&cws->list == workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list.next)
seq_printf(s, "\n");
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
pid = find_get_pid(cws->pid);
if (pid) {
tsk = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);