forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
init/main.c: fix misleading "This architecture does not have kernel memory protection" message
This message leads to thinking that memory protection is not implemented for the said architecture, whereas absence of CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX only means that memory protection has not been selected at compile time. Don't print this message when CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is selected by the architecture. Instead, print "Kernel memory protection not selected by kernel config." Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/62477e446d9685459d4f27d193af6ff1bd69d55f.1578557581.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
283900e828
commit
f596ded1a0
|
@ -1104,6 +1104,11 @@ static void mark_readonly(void)
|
|||
} else
|
||||
pr_info("Kernel memory protection disabled.\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
#elif defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX)
|
||||
static inline void mark_readonly(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
pr_warn("Kernel memory protection not selected by kernel config.\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
static inline void mark_readonly(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user