forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
bpf: remove mark access for SK_SKB program types
The skb->mark field is a union with reserved_tailroom which is used in the TCP code paths from stream memory allocation. Allowing SK_SKB programs to set this field creates a conflict with future code optimizations, such as "gifting" the skb to the egress path instead of creating a new skb and doing a memcpy. Because we do not have a released version of SK_SKB yet lets just remove it for now. A more appropriate scratch pad to use at the socket layer is dev_scratch, but lets add that in future kernels when needed. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
34f79502bb
commit
f7e9cb1ecb
|
@ -3684,7 +3684,6 @@ static bool sk_skb_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
|
|||
{
|
||||
if (type == BPF_WRITE) {
|
||||
switch (off) {
|
||||
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, mark):
|
||||
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, tc_index):
|
||||
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, priority):
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -3694,6 +3693,7 @@ static bool sk_skb_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
switch (off) {
|
||||
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, mark):
|
||||
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid):
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, data):
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1130,15 +1130,27 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
|||
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"check skb->mark is writeable by SK_SKB",
|
||||
"invalid access of skb->mark for SK_SKB",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"check skb->mark is not writeable by SK_SKB",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"check skb->tc_index is writeable by SK_SKB",
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user