selftests/bpf: Fix test_progs's parsing of test numbers

When specifying disjoint set of tests, test_progs doesn't set skipped test's
array elements to false. This leads to spurious execution of tests that should
have been skipped. Fix it by explicitly initializing them to false.

Fixes: 3a516a0a3a ("selftests/bpf: add sub-tests support for test_progs")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200314013932.4035712-2-andriin@fb.com
This commit is contained in:
Andrii Nakryiko 2020-03-13 18:39:31 -07:00 committed by Daniel Borkmann
parent 94c2f50b61
commit fc32490bff

View File

@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ static int parse_str_list(const char *s, struct str_set *set)
int parse_num_list(const char *s, struct test_selector *sel)
{
int i, set_len = 0, num, start = 0, end = -1;
int i, set_len = 0, new_len, num, start = 0, end = -1;
bool *set = NULL, *tmp, parsing_end = false;
char *next;
@ -459,18 +459,19 @@ int parse_num_list(const char *s, struct test_selector *sel)
return -EINVAL;
if (end + 1 > set_len) {
set_len = end + 1;
tmp = realloc(set, set_len);
new_len = end + 1;
tmp = realloc(set, new_len);
if (!tmp) {
free(set);
return -ENOMEM;
}
for (i = set_len; i < start; i++)
tmp[i] = false;
set = tmp;
set_len = new_len;
}
for (i = start; i <= end; i++) {
for (i = start; i <= end; i++)
set[i] = true;
}
}
if (!set)