forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
[JFFS2] When retiring nextblock, allocate a node_ref for the wasted space
Failing to do so makes the calculated length of the last node incorrect, when we're not using eraseblock summaries. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ba72cb754
commit
fc6612f627
|
@ -317,6 +317,8 @@ static int jffs2_do_reserve_space(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, uint32_t minsize,
|
|||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (jeb && minsize > jeb->free_size) {
|
||||
uint32_t waste;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Skip the end of this block and file it as having some dirty space */
|
||||
/* If there's a pending write to it, flush now */
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -329,10 +331,26 @@ static int jffs2_do_reserve_space(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, uint32_t minsize,
|
|||
goto restart;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
c->wasted_size += jeb->free_size;
|
||||
c->free_size -= jeb->free_size;
|
||||
jeb->wasted_size += jeb->free_size;
|
||||
jeb->free_size = 0;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs(c, jeb, 1);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
/* Just lock it again and continue. Nothing much can change because
|
||||
we hold c->alloc_sem anyway. In fact, it's not entirely clear why
|
||||
we hold c->erase_completion_lock in the majority of this function...
|
||||
but that's a question for another (more caffeine-rich) day. */
|
||||
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
waste = jeb->free_size;
|
||||
jffs2_link_node_ref(c, jeb,
|
||||
(jeb->offset + c->sector_size - waste) | REF_OBSOLETE,
|
||||
waste, NULL);
|
||||
/* FIXME: that made it count as dirty. Convert to wasted */
|
||||
jeb->dirty_size -= waste;
|
||||
c->dirty_size -= waste;
|
||||
jeb->wasted_size += waste;
|
||||
c->wasted_size += waste;
|
||||
|
||||
jffs2_close_nextblock(c, jeb);
|
||||
jeb = NULL;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user