forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
btrfs: add nesting tags to the locking helpers
We will need these when we switch to an rwsem, so plumb in the infrastructure here to use later on. I violate the 80 character limit some here because it'll be cleaned up later. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
51899412dd
commit
fd7ba1c120
|
@ -2875,7 +2875,8 @@ int btrfs_search_slot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
if (!btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic(b)) {
|
||||
btrfs_set_path_blocking(p);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(b, p->recurse);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(b, BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL,
|
||||
p->recurse);
|
||||
}
|
||||
p->locks[level] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -5453,7 +5454,9 @@ int btrfs_next_old_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
|
|||
}
|
||||
if (!ret) {
|
||||
btrfs_set_path_blocking(path);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(next, path->recurse);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(next,
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL,
|
||||
path->recurse);
|
||||
}
|
||||
next_rw_lock = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -5488,7 +5491,9 @@ int btrfs_next_old_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
|
|||
ret = btrfs_try_tree_read_lock(next);
|
||||
if (!ret) {
|
||||
btrfs_set_path_blocking(path);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(next, path->recurse);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(next,
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL,
|
||||
path->recurse);
|
||||
}
|
||||
next_rw_lock = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ void btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
|||
*
|
||||
* The rwlock is held upon exit.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void __btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb, bool recurse)
|
||||
void __btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb, enum btrfs_lock_nesting nest,
|
||||
bool recurse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u64 start_ns = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -282,7 +283,7 @@ void __btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb, bool recurse)
|
|||
|
||||
void btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(eb, false);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(eb, BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -415,7 +416,7 @@ void btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
|||
*
|
||||
* The rwlock is held for write upon exit.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
||||
void __btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb, enum btrfs_lock_nesting nest)
|
||||
__acquires(&eb->lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u64 start_ns = 0;
|
||||
|
@ -440,6 +441,11 @@ void btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
|||
trace_btrfs_tree_lock(eb, start_ns);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_lock(eb, BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Release the write lock, either blocking or spinning (ie. there's no need
|
||||
* for an explicit blocking unlock, like btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking).
|
||||
|
@ -565,7 +571,7 @@ struct extent_buffer *__btrfs_read_lock_root_node(struct btrfs_root *root,
|
|||
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
eb = btrfs_root_node(root);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(eb, recurse);
|
||||
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(eb, BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL, recurse);
|
||||
if (eb == root->node)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
btrfs_tree_read_unlock(eb);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -16,12 +16,35 @@
|
|||
#define BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK_BLOCKING 3
|
||||
#define BTRFS_READ_LOCK_BLOCKING 4
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We are limited in number of subclasses by MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES, which at
|
||||
* the time of this patch is 8, which is how many we use. Keep this in mind if
|
||||
* you decide you want to add another subclass.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
enum btrfs_lock_nesting {
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL,
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We are limited to MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBLCLASSES number of subclasses, so
|
||||
* add this in here and add a static_assert to keep us from going over
|
||||
* the limit. As of this writing we're limited to 8, and we're
|
||||
* definitely using 8, hence this check to keep us from messing up in
|
||||
* the future.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_MAX,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static_assert(BTRFS_NESTING_MAX <= MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES,
|
||||
"too many lock subclasses defined");
|
||||
|
||||
struct btrfs_path;
|
||||
|
||||
void __btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb, enum btrfs_lock_nesting nest);
|
||||
void btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb);
|
||||
void btrfs_tree_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb);
|
||||
|
||||
void __btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb, bool recurse);
|
||||
void __btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb, enum btrfs_lock_nesting nest,
|
||||
bool recurse);
|
||||
void btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb);
|
||||
void btrfs_tree_read_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb);
|
||||
void btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user