forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
x86: lguest: Convert to new irq chip functions
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a5ef2e7040
commit
fe25c7fc2e
|
@ -791,22 +791,22 @@ static void lguest_flush_tlb_kernel(void)
|
|||
* simple as setting a bit. We don't actually "ack" interrupts as such, we
|
||||
* just mask and unmask them. I wonder if we should be cleverer?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void disable_lguest_irq(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
static void disable_lguest_irq(struct irq_data *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
set_bit(irq, lguest_data.blocked_interrupts);
|
||||
set_bit(data->irq, lguest_data.blocked_interrupts);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void enable_lguest_irq(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
static void enable_lguest_irq(struct irq_data *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
clear_bit(irq, lguest_data.blocked_interrupts);
|
||||
clear_bit(data->irq, lguest_data.blocked_interrupts);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* This structure describes the lguest IRQ controller. */
|
||||
static struct irq_chip lguest_irq_controller = {
|
||||
.name = "lguest",
|
||||
.mask = disable_lguest_irq,
|
||||
.mask_ack = disable_lguest_irq,
|
||||
.unmask = enable_lguest_irq,
|
||||
.irq_mask = disable_lguest_irq,
|
||||
.irq_mask_ack = disable_lguest_irq,
|
||||
.irq_unmask = enable_lguest_irq,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user