Compared to the static devices the dynamic have a DMA resource.
This should be save as it seems unused in the driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
As the kernel contains a copy of the GPL anyhow just get rid of the address
specification instead of fixing it.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
The chip is actually located on the module, not on the base board. But
other base boards might add more SPI devices, so the spi_board_info
struct must be separated from the module code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 08:42:23PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>,
> > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
> >
> > ... which causes my mutt to only reply to the list.
>
> Ah, ok. /me hacking in muttrc... Does it work now?
Yep :)
> > mxc_register_device(&mxc_uart_device0, &uart_pdata);
> > + mxc_register_device(&mxc_uart_device1, &uart_pdata);
> > + mxc_register_device(&mxc_uart_device2, &uart_pdata);
>
> What about the RXD3/TXD3 pins?
You're right - I got the IOMUX tables wrong and thought UART0 pins are
selected unconditionally. But as it turns out TXD1/RXD1 is for UART0
(mxc_uart_device0), TXD2/RXD2 for UART1 (mxc_uart_device1) etc.
Below is a new patch.
Thanks,
Daniel
From e7eb5fa0fed09d667a4b2f168fe466e2cc645abb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:22:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: MX3: add two more UARTs to lilly-1131-db
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Support code for lilly-1131 is implemented in a module/baseboard
fashion. All code specific to peripherals found on the development board
will go to this file.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
