Build breaks when DELL_LAPTOP=y and POWER_SUPPLY=m. DELL_LAPTOP needs to
depend on POWER_SUPPLY.
dell-laptop.c:(.text+0x1ef3c4): undefined reference to `power_supply_is_system_supplied'
dell-laptop.c:(.text+0x1ef45e): undefined reference to `power_supply_is_system_supplied'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Otherwise with INPUT=m, EEEPC_LAPTOP=y one gets
drivers/built-in.o: In function `input_sync':
eeepc-laptop.c:(.text+0x18ce51): undefined reference to `input_event'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `input_report_key':
eeepc-laptop.c:(.text+0x18ce73): undefined reference to `input_event'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `eeepc_hotk_check':
eeepc-laptop.c:(.text+0x18d05f): undefined reference to `input_allocate_device'
eeepc-laptop.c:(.text+0x18d10f): undefined reference to `input_register_device'
eeepc-laptop.c:(.text+0x18d131): undefined reference to `input_free_device'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `eeepc_backlight_exit':
eeepc-laptop.c:(.text+0x18d546): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Update Kconfig, now asus-laptop use the input layer.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This code is required to keep the thinkpad-acpi maintainer sane, and
it is disabled by default.
Add a debug facility to simulate an rfkill hardware rocker switch, a
bluetooth rfkill soft-switch, a WWAN rfkill soft-switch on thinkpads.
The simulated switches obviously do not kill any radios in hardware or
firmware (unlike the real one). They also don't issue deprecated proc
events.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
These are platform specific drivers that happen to use ACPI,
while drivers/acpi/ is for code that implements ACPI itself.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Move x86 platform specific drivers from drivers/misc/
to a new home under drivers/platform/x86/.
The community has been maintaining x86 vendor-specific
platform specific drivers under /drivers/misc/ for a few years.
The oldest ones started life under drivers/acpi.
They moved out of drivers/acpi/ because they don't actually
implement the ACPI specification, but either simply
use ACPI, or implement vendor-specific ACPI extensions.
In the future we anticipate...
drivers/misc/ will go away.
other architectures will create drivers/platform/<arch>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
