Dale Farnsworth 84dd619e4d mv643xx_eth: Place explicit port number in mv643xx_eth_platform_data ... We were using the platform_device.id field to identify which ethernet port is used for mv643xx_eth device. This is not generally correct. It will be incorrect, for example, if a hardware platform uses a single port but not the first port. Here, we add an explicit port_number field to struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data. This makes the mv643xx_eth_platform_data structure required, but that isn't an issue since all users currently provide it already. Signed-off-by: Dale Farnsworth <dale@farnsworth.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>		2007-03-06 06:14:54 -05:00
..
jaguar_atx	mv643xx_eth: Place explicit port number in mv643xx_eth_platform_data	2007-03-06 06:14:54 -05:00
ocelot_3	mv643xx_eth: Place explicit port number in mv643xx_eth_platform_data	2007-03-06 06:14:54 -05:00
ocelot_c	mv643xx_eth: Place explicit port number in mv643xx_eth_platform_data	2007-03-06 06:14:54 -05:00
ocelot_g	[MIPS] Kill redundant EXTRA_AFLAGS	2007-02-26 23:06:05 +00:00
Kconfig	Sliceup Kconfig; it's grown too large.	2005-10-29 19:32:41 +01:00