forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
1eb19a12bd
For ChromiumOS, we use SHA-1 to verify the integrity of the root filesystem. The speed of the kernel sha-1 implementation has a major impact on our boot performance. To improve boot performance, we investigated using the heavily optimized sha-1 implementation used in git. With the git sha-1 implementation, we see a 11.7% improvement in boot time. 10 reboots, remove slowest/fastest. Before: Mean: 6.58 seconds Stdev: 0.14 After (with git sha-1, this patch): Mean: 5.89 seconds Stdev: 0.07 The other cool thing about the git SHA-1 implementation is that it only needs 64 bytes of stack for the workspace while the original kernel implementation needed 320 bytes. Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org> Cc: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
200 lines
6.0 KiB
C
200 lines
6.0 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* SHA1 routine optimized to do word accesses rather than byte accesses,
|
|
* and to avoid unnecessary copies into the context array.
|
|
*
|
|
* This was based on the git SHA1 implementation.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
|
#include <linux/bitops.h>
|
|
#include <asm/unaligned.h>
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If you have 32 registers or more, the compiler can (and should)
|
|
* try to change the array[] accesses into registers. However, on
|
|
* machines with less than ~25 registers, that won't really work,
|
|
* and at least gcc will make an unholy mess of it.
|
|
*
|
|
* So to avoid that mess which just slows things down, we force
|
|
* the stores to memory to actually happen (we might be better off
|
|
* with a 'W(t)=(val);asm("":"+m" (W(t))' there instead, as
|
|
* suggested by Artur Skawina - that will also make gcc unable to
|
|
* try to do the silly "optimize away loads" part because it won't
|
|
* see what the value will be).
|
|
*
|
|
* Ben Herrenschmidt reports that on PPC, the C version comes close
|
|
* to the optimized asm with this (ie on PPC you don't want that
|
|
* 'volatile', since there are lots of registers).
|
|
*
|
|
* On ARM we get the best code generation by forcing a full memory barrier
|
|
* between each SHA_ROUND, otherwise gcc happily get wild with spilling and
|
|
* the stack frame size simply explode and performance goes down the drain.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_X86
|
|
#define setW(x, val) (*(volatile __u32 *)&W(x) = (val))
|
|
#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM)
|
|
#define setW(x, val) do { W(x) = (val); __asm__("":::"memory"); } while (0)
|
|
#else
|
|
#define setW(x, val) (W(x) = (val))
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
/* This "rolls" over the 512-bit array */
|
|
#define W(x) (array[(x)&15])
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Where do we get the source from? The first 16 iterations get it from
|
|
* the input data, the next mix it from the 512-bit array.
|
|
*/
|
|
#define SHA_SRC(t) get_unaligned_be32((__u32 *)data + t)
|
|
#define SHA_MIX(t) rol32(W(t+13) ^ W(t+8) ^ W(t+2) ^ W(t), 1)
|
|
|
|
#define SHA_ROUND(t, input, fn, constant, A, B, C, D, E) do { \
|
|
__u32 TEMP = input(t); setW(t, TEMP); \
|
|
E += TEMP + rol32(A,5) + (fn) + (constant); \
|
|
B = ror32(B, 2); } while (0)
|
|
|
|
#define T_0_15(t, A, B, C, D, E) SHA_ROUND(t, SHA_SRC, (((C^D)&B)^D) , 0x5a827999, A, B, C, D, E )
|
|
#define T_16_19(t, A, B, C, D, E) SHA_ROUND(t, SHA_MIX, (((C^D)&B)^D) , 0x5a827999, A, B, C, D, E )
|
|
#define T_20_39(t, A, B, C, D, E) SHA_ROUND(t, SHA_MIX, (B^C^D) , 0x6ed9eba1, A, B, C, D, E )
|
|
#define T_40_59(t, A, B, C, D, E) SHA_ROUND(t, SHA_MIX, ((B&C)+(D&(B^C))) , 0x8f1bbcdc, A, B, C, D, E )
|
|
#define T_60_79(t, A, B, C, D, E) SHA_ROUND(t, SHA_MIX, (B^C^D) , 0xca62c1d6, A, B, C, D, E )
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* sha_transform - single block SHA1 transform
|
|
*
|
|
* @digest: 160 bit digest to update
|
|
* @data: 512 bits of data to hash
|
|
* @array: 16 words of workspace (see note)
|
|
*
|
|
* This function generates a SHA1 digest for a single 512-bit block.
|
|
* Be warned, it does not handle padding and message digest, do not
|
|
* confuse it with the full FIPS 180-1 digest algorithm for variable
|
|
* length messages.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note: If the hash is security sensitive, the caller should be sure
|
|
* to clear the workspace. This is left to the caller to avoid
|
|
* unnecessary clears between chained hashing operations.
|
|
*/
|
|
void sha_transform(__u32 *digest, const char *data, __u32 *array)
|
|
{
|
|
__u32 A, B, C, D, E;
|
|
|
|
A = digest[0];
|
|
B = digest[1];
|
|
C = digest[2];
|
|
D = digest[3];
|
|
E = digest[4];
|
|
|
|
/* Round 1 - iterations 0-16 take their input from 'data' */
|
|
T_0_15( 0, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_0_15( 1, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_0_15( 2, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_0_15( 3, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_0_15( 4, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
T_0_15( 5, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_0_15( 6, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_0_15( 7, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_0_15( 8, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_0_15( 9, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
T_0_15(10, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_0_15(11, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_0_15(12, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_0_15(13, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_0_15(14, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
T_0_15(15, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
|
|
/* Round 1 - tail. Input from 512-bit mixing array */
|
|
T_16_19(16, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_16_19(17, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_16_19(18, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_16_19(19, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
|
|
/* Round 2 */
|
|
T_20_39(20, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_20_39(21, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_20_39(22, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_20_39(23, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_20_39(24, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
T_20_39(25, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_20_39(26, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_20_39(27, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_20_39(28, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_20_39(29, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
T_20_39(30, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_20_39(31, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_20_39(32, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_20_39(33, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_20_39(34, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
T_20_39(35, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_20_39(36, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_20_39(37, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_20_39(38, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_20_39(39, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
|
|
/* Round 3 */
|
|
T_40_59(40, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_40_59(41, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_40_59(42, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_40_59(43, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_40_59(44, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
T_40_59(45, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_40_59(46, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_40_59(47, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_40_59(48, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_40_59(49, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
T_40_59(50, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_40_59(51, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_40_59(52, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_40_59(53, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_40_59(54, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
T_40_59(55, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_40_59(56, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_40_59(57, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_40_59(58, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_40_59(59, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
|
|
/* Round 4 */
|
|
T_60_79(60, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_60_79(61, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_60_79(62, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_60_79(63, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_60_79(64, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
T_60_79(65, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_60_79(66, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_60_79(67, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_60_79(68, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_60_79(69, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
T_60_79(70, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_60_79(71, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_60_79(72, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_60_79(73, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_60_79(74, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
T_60_79(75, A, B, C, D, E);
|
|
T_60_79(76, E, A, B, C, D);
|
|
T_60_79(77, D, E, A, B, C);
|
|
T_60_79(78, C, D, E, A, B);
|
|
T_60_79(79, B, C, D, E, A);
|
|
|
|
digest[0] += A;
|
|
digest[1] += B;
|
|
digest[2] += C;
|
|
digest[3] += D;
|
|
digest[4] += E;
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sha_transform);
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* sha_init - initialize the vectors for a SHA1 digest
|
|
* @buf: vector to initialize
|
|
*/
|
|
void sha_init(__u32 *buf)
|
|
{
|
|
buf[0] = 0x67452301;
|
|
buf[1] = 0xefcdab89;
|
|
buf[2] = 0x98badcfe;
|
|
buf[3] = 0x10325476;
|
|
buf[4] = 0xc3d2e1f0;
|
|
}
|