forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
298decfbc4
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 16:56 +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > But most often this happens if people upgrade their CPU and do not > update their BIOS. > Or the vendor does not recognise the new CPU even if the BIOS got > updated. Maybe some of those people just didn't realize it was disabled in BIOS? If you tell users that it's a firmware bug then they'll probably just give up. > The itself message might be an enhancment, IMO it's not worth a patch. Why do you think so? I spent an hour on hunting down the BIOS upgrade, only to find that it didn't improve anything. It was a day later that I realized that it might be a BIOS option; and the option was literally the _last_ option in the whole BIOS setup. :) This message would have saved the day. > But do not revert the FW_BUG part! Sure, you have a point here. How about this patch? |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| alpha | ||
| arm | ||
| avr32 | ||
| blackfin | ||
| cris | ||
| frv | ||
| h8300 | ||
| ia64 | ||
| m32r | ||
| m68k | ||
| m68knommu | ||
| microblaze | ||
| mips | ||
| mn10300 | ||
| parisc | ||
| powerpc | ||
| s390 | ||
| score | ||
| sh | ||
| sparc | ||
| um | ||
| x86 | ||
| xtensa | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| Kconfig | ||