Jon Paul Maloy a11607f5a1 tipc: correct usage of spin_lock() vs spin_lock_bh() ... I commit e099e86c9e ("tipc: add node_lock protection to link lookup function") we are calling spin_lock(&node->lock) directly instead of indirectly via the tipc_node_lock(node) function. However, tipc_node_lock() is using spin_lock_bh(), not spin_lock(), something leading to unbalanced usage in one place, and a smatch warning. We fix this by consistently using tipc_node_lock()/unlock() in in the places touched by the mentioned commit. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>		2014-02-17 00:26:34 -05:00
..
9p
802
8021q
appletalk
atm
ax25
batman-adv
bluetooth
bridge
caif
can
ceph
core
dcb
dccp
decnet
dns_resolver
dsa
ethernet
hsr
ieee802154
ipv4
ipv6
ipx
irda
iucv
key
l2tp
lapb
llc
mac80211
mac802154
mpls
netfilter
netlabel
netlink
netrom
nfc
openvswitch
packet
phonet
rds
rfkill
rose
rxrpc
sched
sctp
sunrpc
tipc	tipc: correct usage of spin_lock() vs spin_lock_bh()	2014-02-17 00:26:34 -05:00
unix
vmw_vsock
wimax
wireless
x25
xfrm
compat.c
Kconfig
Makefile
nonet.c
socket.c
sysctl_net.c