Thomas Gleixner 7270d11c56 arm/bL_switcher: Kill tick suspend hackery ... Use the new tick_suspend/resume_local() and get rid of the homebrewn implementation of these in the ARM bL switcher. The check for the cpumask is completely pointless. There is no harm to suspend a per cpu tick device unconditionally. If that's a real issue then we fix it proper at the core level and not with some completely undocumented hacks in some random core code. Move the tick internals to the core code, now that this nuisance is gone. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> [ rjw: Rebase, changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1655112.Ws17YsMfN7@vostro.rjw.lan Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>		2015-04-01 14:23:00 +02:00
..
bL_switcher_dummy_if.c
bL_switcher.c	arm/bL_switcher: Kill tick suspend hackery	2015-04-01 14:23:00 +02:00
dmabounce.c
edma.c	ARM: SoC driver updates for 3.19	2014-12-09 14:48:22 -08:00
firmware.c
icst.c
it8152.c
Kconfig
locomo.c
Makefile
mcpm_entry.c
mcpm_head.S
mcpm_platsmp.c
sa1111.c	Driver core patches for 3.19-rc1	2014-12-14 16:10:09 -08:00
scoop.c
sharpsl_param.c
timer-sp.c
vlock.h
vlock.S