kernel_optimize_test/lib/list_debug.c
Linus Torvalds 3c18d4de86 Expand CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST to several other list operations
When list debugging is enabled, we aim to readably show list corruption
errors, and the basic list_add/list_del operations end up having extra
debugging code in them to do some basic validation of the list entries.

However, "list_del_init()" and "list_move[_tail]()" ended up avoiding
the debug code due to how they were written. This fixes that.

So the _next_ time we have list_move() problems with stale list entries,
we'll hopefully have an easier time finding them..

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-18 11:32:28 -08:00

76 lines
1.9 KiB
C

/*
* Copyright 2006, Red Hat, Inc., Dave Jones
* Released under the General Public License (GPL).
*
* This file contains the linked list implementations for
* DEBUG_LIST.
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
/*
* Insert a new entry between two known consecutive entries.
*
* This is only for internal list manipulation where we know
* the prev/next entries already!
*/
void __list_add(struct list_head *new,
struct list_head *prev,
struct list_head *next)
{
WARN(next->prev != prev,
"list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
"prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
prev, next->prev, next);
WARN(prev->next != next,
"list_add corruption. prev->next should be "
"next (%p), but was %p. (prev=%p).\n",
next, prev->next, prev);
next->prev = new;
new->next = next;
new->prev = prev;
prev->next = new;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add);
void __list_del_entry(struct list_head *entry)
{
struct list_head *prev, *next;
prev = entry->prev;
next = entry->next;
if (WARN(next == LIST_POISON1,
"list_del corruption, %p->next is LIST_POISON1 (%p)\n",
entry, LIST_POISON1) ||
WARN(prev == LIST_POISON2,
"list_del corruption, %p->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%p)\n",
entry, LIST_POISON2) ||
WARN(prev->next != entry,
"list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, "
"but was %p\n", entry, prev->next) ||
WARN(next->prev != entry,
"list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, "
"but was %p\n", entry, next->prev))
return;
__list_del(prev, next);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_del_entry);
/**
* list_del - deletes entry from list.
* @entry: the element to delete from the list.
* Note: list_empty on entry does not return true after this, the entry is
* in an undefined state.
*/
void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
{
__list_del_entry(entry);
entry->next = LIST_POISON1;
entry->prev = LIST_POISON2;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(list_del);