kernel_optimize_test/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c
Linus Torvalds 1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

165 lines
4.6 KiB
C

/*
* MIPS-specific semaphore code.
*
* Copyright (C) 1999 Cort Dougan <cort@cs.nmt.edu>
* Copyright (C) 2004 Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* April 2001 - Reworked by Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
* to eliminate the SMP races in the old version between the updates
* of `count' and `waking'. Now we use negative `count' values to
* indicate that some process(es) are waiting for the semaphore.
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
#include <asm/cpu-features.h>
#include <asm/errno.h>
#include <asm/semaphore.h>
#include <asm/war.h>
/*
* Atomically update sem->count.
* This does the equivalent of the following:
*
* old_count = sem->count;
* tmp = MAX(old_count, 0) + incr;
* sem->count = tmp;
* return old_count;
*
* On machines without lld/scd we need a spinlock to make the manipulation of
* sem->count and sem->waking atomic. Scalability isn't an issue because
* this lock is used on UP only so it's just an empty variable.
*/
static inline int __sem_update_count(struct semaphore *sem, int incr)
{
int old_count, tmp;
if (cpu_has_llsc && R10000_LLSC_WAR) {
__asm__ __volatile__(
"1: ll %0, %2 \n"
" sra %1, %0, 31 \n"
" not %1 \n"
" and %1, %0, %1 \n"
" add %1, %1, %3 \n"
" sc %1, %2 \n"
" beqzl %1, 1b \n"
: "=&r" (old_count), "=&r" (tmp), "=m" (sem->count)
: "r" (incr), "m" (sem->count));
} else if (cpu_has_llsc) {
__asm__ __volatile__(
"1: ll %0, %2 \n"
" sra %1, %0, 31 \n"
" not %1 \n"
" and %1, %0, %1 \n"
" add %1, %1, %3 \n"
" sc %1, %2 \n"
" beqz %1, 1b \n"
: "=&r" (old_count), "=&r" (tmp), "=m" (sem->count)
: "r" (incr), "m" (sem->count));
} else {
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(semaphore_lock);
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&semaphore_lock, flags);
old_count = atomic_read(&sem->count);
tmp = max_t(int, old_count, 0) + incr;
atomic_set(&sem->count, tmp);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&semaphore_lock, flags);
}
return old_count;
}
void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
{
/*
* Note that we incremented count in up() before we came here,
* but that was ineffective since the result was <= 0, and
* any negative value of count is equivalent to 0.
* This ends up setting count to 1, unless count is now > 0
* (i.e. because some other cpu has called up() in the meantime),
* in which case we just increment count.
*/
__sem_update_count(sem, 1);
wake_up(&sem->wait);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up);
/*
* Note that when we come in to __down or __down_interruptible,
* we have already decremented count, but that decrement was
* ineffective since the result was < 0, and any negative value
* of count is equivalent to 0.
* Thus it is only when we decrement count from some value > 0
* that we have actually got the semaphore.
*/
void __sched __down(struct semaphore *sem)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);
/*
* Try to get the semaphore. If the count is > 0, then we've
* got the semaphore; we decrement count and exit the loop.
* If the count is 0 or negative, we set it to -1, indicating
* that we are asleep, and then sleep.
*/
while (__sem_update_count(sem, -1) <= 0) {
schedule();
set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
}
remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING);
/*
* If there are any more sleepers, wake one of them up so
* that it can either get the semaphore, or set count to -1
* indicating that there are still processes sleeping.
*/
wake_up(&sem->wait);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down);
int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem)
{
int retval = 0;
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);
while (__sem_update_count(sem, -1) <= 0) {
if (signal_pending(current)) {
/*
* A signal is pending - give up trying.
* Set sem->count to 0 if it is negative,
* since we are no longer sleeping.
*/
__sem_update_count(sem, 0);
retval = -EINTR;
break;
}
schedule();
set_task_state(tsk, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
}
remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING);
wake_up(&sem->wait);
return retval;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible);