forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
75e967a04d
[ Upstream commit eead089311f4d935ab5d1d8fbb0c42ad44699ada ]
lkp reported a build error in fsp2.o:
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/fsp2.o
{standard input}:577: Error: unsupported relocation against base
Which comes from:
pr_err("GESR0: 0x%08x\n", mfdcr(base + PLB4OPB_GESR0));
Where our mfdcr() macro is stringifying "base + PLB4OPB_GESR0", and
passing that to the assembler, which obviously doesn't work.
The mfdcr() macro already checks that the argument is constant using
__builtin_constant_p(), and if not calls the out-of-line version of
mfdcr(). But in this case GCC is smart enough to notice that "base +
PLB4OPB_GESR0" will be constant, even though it's not something we can
immediately stringify into a register number.
Segher pointed out that passing the register number to the inline asm
as a constant would be better, and in fact it fixes the build error,
presumably because it gives GCC a chance to resolve the value.
While we're at it, change mtdcr() similarly.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Acked-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210218123058.748882-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| asm | ||
| uapi/asm | ||