old_inode is not locked; it's not safe to play with its link
count. Instead of bumping it and calling btrfs_unlink_inode(),
add a variant of the latter that does not do btrfs_drop_nlink()/
btrfs_update_inode(), call it instead of btrfs_inc_nlink()/
btrfs_unlink_inode() and do btrfs_update_inode() ourselves.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>