kernel_optimize_test/include/linux/task_work.h
Jens Axboe 91989c7078 task_work: cleanup notification modes
A previous commit changed the notification mode from true/false to an
int, allowing notify-no, notify-yes, or signal-notify. This was
backwards compatible in the sense that any existing true/false user
would translate to either 0 (on notification sent) or 1, the latter
which mapped to TWA_RESUME. TWA_SIGNAL was assigned a value of 2.

Clean this up properly, and define a proper enum for the notification
mode. Now we have:

- TWA_NONE. This is 0, same as before the original change, meaning no
  notification requested.
- TWA_RESUME. This is 1, same as before the original change, meaning
  that we use TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME.
- TWA_SIGNAL. This uses TIF_SIGPENDING/JOBCTL_TASK_WORK for the
  notification.

Clean up all the callers, switching their 0/1/false/true to using the
appropriate TWA_* mode for notifications.

Fixes: e91b481623 ("task_work: teach task_work_add() to do signal_wake_up()")
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-10-17 15:05:30 -06:00

34 lines
718 B
C

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
#ifndef _LINUX_TASK_WORK_H
#define _LINUX_TASK_WORK_H
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
typedef void (*task_work_func_t)(struct callback_head *);
static inline void
init_task_work(struct callback_head *twork, task_work_func_t func)
{
twork->func = func;
}
enum task_work_notify_mode {
TWA_NONE,
TWA_RESUME,
TWA_SIGNAL,
};
int task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *twork,
enum task_work_notify_mode mode);
struct callback_head *task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *, task_work_func_t);
void task_work_run(void);
static inline void exit_task_work(struct task_struct *task)
{
task_work_run();
}
#endif /* _LINUX_TASK_WORK_H */