forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
4ca3ac06e7
commit 1689c169134f4b5a39156122d799b7dca76d8ddb upstream. We always call hold_lkb(lkb) if we increment lkb->lkb_wait_count. So, we always need to call unhold_lkb(lkb) if we decrement lkb->lkb_wait_count. This patch will add missing unhold_lkb(lkb) if we decrement lkb->lkb_wait_count. In case of setting lkb->lkb_wait_count to zero we need to countdown until reaching zero and call unhold_lkb(lkb). The waiters list unhold_lkb(lkb) can be removed because it's done for the last lkb_wait_count decrement iteration as it's done in _remove_from_waiters(). This issue was discovered by a dlm gfs2 test case which use excessively dlm_unlock(LKF_CANCEL) feature. Probably the lkb->lkb_wait_count value never reached above 1 if this feature isn't used and so it was not discovered before. The testcase ended in a rsb on the rsb keep data structure with a refcount of 1 but no lkb was associated with it, which is itself an invalid behaviour. A side effect of that was a condition in which the dlm was sending remove messages in a looping behaviour. With this patch that has not been reproduced. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
ast.c | ||
ast.h | ||
config.c | ||
config.h | ||
debug_fs.c | ||
dir.c | ||
dir.h | ||
dlm_internal.h | ||
Kconfig | ||
lock.c | ||
lock.h | ||
lockspace.c | ||
lockspace.h | ||
lowcomms.c | ||
lowcomms.h | ||
lvb_table.h | ||
main.c | ||
Makefile | ||
member.c | ||
member.h | ||
memory.c | ||
memory.h | ||
midcomms.c | ||
midcomms.h | ||
netlink.c | ||
plock.c | ||
rcom.c | ||
rcom.h | ||
recover.c | ||
recover.h | ||
recoverd.c | ||
recoverd.h | ||
requestqueue.c | ||
requestqueue.h | ||
user.c | ||
user.h | ||
util.c | ||
util.h |