forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
d838d2c09a
It seems drivers/firewire/ohci.c is making some optimistic assumptions about struct fw_ohci and that member "card" will always remain the first member of the struct. Plus it's probably going to confuse a lot of static code analyzers too. So I wonder if there is a good reason not to free the ohci struct just like it was allocated instead of the tricky &ohci->card way? Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> It is perhaps just a rudiment from before mainline submission of the driver. Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| core-card.c | ||
| core-cdev.c | ||
| core-device.c | ||
| core-iso.c | ||
| core-topology.c | ||
| core-transaction.c | ||
| core.h | ||
| init_ohci1394_dma.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| net.c | ||
| nosy-user.h | ||
| nosy.c | ||
| nosy.h | ||
| ohci.c | ||
| ohci.h | ||
| sbp2.c | ||