forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
af71b090c8
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
Lastly, fix the following checkpatch warning:
CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u8' over 'uint8_t'
#50: FILE: net/l2tp/l2tp_core.h:119:
+ uint8_t priv[]; /* private data */
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| l2tp_core.c | ||
| l2tp_core.h | ||
| l2tp_debugfs.c | ||
| l2tp_eth.c | ||
| l2tp_ip.c | ||
| l2tp_ip6.c | ||
| l2tp_netlink.c | ||
| l2tp_ppp.c | ||
| Makefile | ||