mirror of
https://github.com/go-sylixos/elvish.git
synced 2024-11-28 07:21:21 +08:00
Fix the hash code of maps.
This commit is contained in:
parent
cf23f0cce4
commit
900cc52b05
|
@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ Draft release notes for Elvish 0.20.0.
|
|||
- `has-value $li $v` now works correctly when `$li` is a list and `$v` is a
|
||||
composite value, like a map or a list.
|
||||
|
||||
- A bug with how the hash code of a map was computed could lead to unexpected
|
||||
results when using maps as map keys; it has now been fixed.
|
||||
|
||||
# Breaking changes
|
||||
|
||||
- The `except` keyword in the `try` command was deprecated since 0.18.0 and is
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -50,11 +50,20 @@ func Hash(v any) uint32 {
|
|||
}
|
||||
return h
|
||||
case Map:
|
||||
h := hash.DJBInit
|
||||
// The iteration order of maps only depends on the hash of the keys. It
|
||||
// is almost deterministic, with only one exception: when two keys have
|
||||
// the same hash, they get produced in insertion order. As a result, it
|
||||
// is possible for two maps that should be considered equal to produce
|
||||
// entries in different orders.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// So instead of using hash.DJBCombine, combine the hash result from
|
||||
// each key-value pair by summing, so that the order doesn't matter.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// TODO: This may not have very good hashing properties.
|
||||
var h uint32
|
||||
for it := v.Iterator(); it.HasElem(); it.Next() {
|
||||
k, v := it.Elem()
|
||||
h = hash.DJBCombine(h, Hash(k))
|
||||
h = hash.DJBCombine(h, Hash(v))
|
||||
h += hash.DJB(Hash(k), Hash(v))
|
||||
}
|
||||
return h
|
||||
case StructMap:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ import (
|
|||
"unsafe"
|
||||
|
||||
"src.elv.sh/pkg/persistent/hash"
|
||||
"src.elv.sh/pkg/persistent/hashmap"
|
||||
"src.elv.sh/pkg/tt"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -39,3 +40,18 @@ func TestHash(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
Args(nonHasher{}).Rets(uint32(0)),
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestHash_EqualMapsWithDifferentInternal(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// The internal representation of maps with the same value is not always the
|
||||
// same: when some keys of the map have the same hash, their values are
|
||||
// stored in the insertion order.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// To reliably test this case, we construct maps with a custom hashing
|
||||
// function.
|
||||
m0 := hashmap.New(Equal, func(v any) uint32 { return 0 })
|
||||
m1 := m0.Assoc("k1", "v1").Assoc("k2", "v2")
|
||||
m2 := m0.Assoc("k2", "v2").Assoc("k1", "v1")
|
||||
if h1, h2 := Hash(m1), Hash(m2); h1 != h2 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%v != %v", h1, h2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user