tmp_suning_uos_patched/kernel/rcutree.c

1533 lines
44 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

"Tree RCU": scalable classic RCU implementation This patch fixes a long-standing performance bug in classic RCU that results in massive internal-to-RCU lock contention on systems with more than a few hundred CPUs. Although this patch creates a separate flavor of RCU for ease of review and patch maintenance, it is intended to replace classic RCU. This patch still handles stress better than does mainline, so I am still calling it ready for inclusion. This patch is against the -tip tree. Nevertheless, experience on an actual 1000+ CPU machine would still be most welcome. Most of the changes noted below were found while creating an rcutiny (which should permit ejecting the current rcuclassic) and while doing detailed line-by-line documentation. Updates from v9 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/2/334): o Fixes from remainder of line-by-line code walkthrough, including comment spelling, initialization, undesirable narrowing due to type conversion, removing redundant memory barriers, removing redundant local-variable initialization, and removing redundant local variables. I do not believe that any of these fixes address the CPU-hotplug issues that Andi Kleen was seeing, but please do give it a whirl in case the machine is smarter than I am. A writeup from the walkthrough may be found at the following URL, in case you are suffering from terminal insomnia or masochism: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/paulmck/tmp/rcutree-walkthrough.2008.12.16a.pdf o Made rcutree tracing use seq_file, as suggested some time ago by Lai Jiangshan. o Added a .csv variant of the rcudata debugfs trace file, to allow people having thousands of CPUs to drop the data into a spreadsheet. Tested with oocalc and gnumeric. Updated documentation to suit. Updates from v8 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/15/139): o Fix a theoretical race between grace-period initialization and force_quiescent_state() that could occur if more than three jiffies were required to carry out the grace-period initialization. Which it might, if you had enough CPUs. o Apply Ingo's printk-standardization patch. o Substitute local variables for repeated accesses to global variables. o Fix comment misspellings and redundant (but harmless) increments of ->n_rcu_pending (this latter after having explicitly added it). o Apply checkpatch fixes. Updates from v7 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/10/291): o Fixed a number of problems noted by Gautham Shenoy, including the cpu-stall-detection bug that he was having difficulty convincing me was real. ;-) o Changed cpu-stall detection to wait for ten seconds rather than three in order to reduce false positive, as suggested by Ingo Molnar. o Produced a design document (http://lwn.net/Articles/305782/). The act of writing this document uncovered a number of both theoretical and "here and now" bugs as noted below. o Fix dynticks_nesting accounting confusion, simplify WARN_ON() condition, fix kerneldoc comments, and add memory barriers in dynticks interface functions. o Add more data to tracing. o Remove unused "rcu_barrier" field from rcu_data structure. o Count calls to rcu_pending() from scheduling-clock interrupt to use as a surrogate timebase should jiffies stop counting. o Fix a theoretical race between force_quiescent_state() and grace-period initialization. Yes, initialization does have to go on for some jiffies for this race to occur, but given enough CPUs... Updates from v6 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/23/448): o Fix a number of checkpatch.pl complaints. o Apply review comments from Ingo Molnar and Lai Jiangshan on the stall-detection code. o Fix several bugs in !CONFIG_SMP builds. o Fix a misspelled config-parameter name so that RCU now announces at boot time if stall detection is configured. o Run tests on numerous combinations of configurations parameters, which after the fixes above, now build and run correctly. Updates from v5 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/15/92, bad subject line): o Fix a compiler error in the !CONFIG_FANOUT_EXACT case (blew a changeset some time ago, and finally got around to retesting this option). o Fix some tracing bugs in rcupreempt that caused incorrect totals to be printed. o I now test with a more brutal random-selection online/offline script (attached). Probably more brutal than it needs to be on the people reading it as well, but so it goes. o A number of optimizations and usability improvements: o Make rcu_pending() ignore the grace-period timeout when there is no grace period in progress. o Make force_quiescent_state() avoid going for a global lock in the case where there is no grace period in progress. o Rearrange struct fields to improve struct layout. o Make call_rcu() initiate a grace period if RCU was idle, rather than waiting for the next scheduling clock interrupt. o Invoke rcu_irq_enter() and rcu_irq_exit() only when idle, as suggested by Andi Kleen. I still don't completely trust this change, and might back it out. o Make CONFIG_RCU_TRACE be the single config variable manipulated for all forms of RCU, instead of the prior confusion. o Document tracing files and formats for both rcupreempt and rcutree. Updates from v4 for those missing v5 given its bad subject line: o Separated dynticks interface so that NMIs and irqs call separate functions, greatly simplifying it. In particular, this code no longer requires a proof of correctness. ;-) o Separated dynticks state out into its own per-CPU structure, avoiding the duplicated accounting. o The case where a dynticks-idle CPU runs an irq handler that invokes call_rcu() is now correctly handled, forcing that CPU out of dynticks-idle mode. o Review comments have been applied (thank you all!!!). For but one example, fixed the dynticks-ordering issue that Manfred pointed out, saving me much debugging. ;-) o Adjusted rcuclassic and rcupreempt to handle dynticks changes. Attached is an updated patch to Classic RCU that applies a hierarchy, greatly reducing the contention on the top-level lock for large machines. This passes 10-hour concurrent rcutorture and online-offline testing on 128-CPU ppc64 without dynticks enabled, and exposes some timekeeping bugs in presence of dynticks (exciting working on a system where "sleep 1" hangs until interrupted...), which were fixed in the 2.6.27 kernel. It is getting more reliable than mainline by some measures, so the next version will be against -tip for inclusion. See also Manfred Spraul's recent patches (or his earlier work from 2004 at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=108546384711797&w=2). We will converge onto a common patch in the fullness of time, but are currently exploring different regions of the design space. That said, I have already gratefully stolen quite a few of Manfred's ideas. This patch provides CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, which controls the bushiness of the RCU hierarchy. Defaults to 32 on 32-bit machines and 64 on 64-bit machines. If CONFIG_NR_CPUS is less than CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, there is no hierarchy. By default, the RCU initialization code will adjust CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT to balance the hierarchy, so strongly NUMA architectures may choose to set CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT to disable this balancing, allowing the hierarchy to be exactly aligned to the underlying hardware. Up to two levels of hierarchy are permitted (in addition to the root node), allowing up to 16,384 CPUs on 32-bit systems and up to 262,144 CPUs on 64-bit systems. I just know that I am going to regret saying this, but this seems more than sufficient for the foreseeable future. (Some architectures might wish to set CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=4, which would limit such architectures to 64 CPUs. If this becomes a real problem, additional levels can be added, but I doubt that it will make a significant difference on real hardware.) In the common case, a given CPU will manipulate its private rcu_data structure and the rcu_node structure that it shares with its immediate neighbors. This can reduce both lock and memory contention by multiple orders of magnitude, which should eliminate the need for the strange manipulations that are reported to be required when running Linux on very large systems. Some shortcomings: o More bugs will probably surface as a result of an ongoing line-by-line code inspection. Patches will be provided as required. o There are probably hangs, rcutorture failures, &c. Seems quite stable on a 128-CPU machine, but that is kind of small compared to 4096 CPUs. However, seems to do better than mainline. Patches will be provided as required. o The memory footprint of this version is several KB larger than rcuclassic. A separate UP-only rcutiny patch will be provided, which will reduce the memory footprint significantly, even compared to the old rcuclassic. One such patch passes light testing, and has a memory footprint smaller even than rcuclassic. Initial reaction from various embedded guys was "it is not worth it", so am putting it aside. Credits: o Manfred Spraul for ideas, review comments, and bugs spotted, as well as some good friendly competition. ;-) o Josh Triplett, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan, Andi Kleen, Andy Whitcroft, and Andrew Morton for reviews and comments. o Thomas Gleixner for much-needed help with some timer issues (see patches below). o Jon M. Tollefson, Tim Pepper, Andrew Theurer, Jose R. Santos, Andy Whitcroft, Darrick Wong, Nishanth Aravamudan, Anton Blanchard, Dave Kleikamp, and Nathan Lynch for keeping machines alive despite my heavy abuse^Wtesting. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-12-19 04:55:32 +08:00
/*
* Read-Copy Update mechanism for mutual exclusion
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
*
* Copyright IBM Corporation, 2008
*
* Authors: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
* Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Hierarchical version
*
* Based on the original work by Paul McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
* and inputs from Rusty Russell, Andrea Arcangeli and Andi Kleen.
*
* For detailed explanation of Read-Copy Update mechanism see -
* Documentation/RCU
*/
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/time.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
static struct lock_class_key rcu_lock_key;
struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map =
STATIC_LOCKDEP_MAP_INIT("rcu_read_lock", &rcu_lock_key);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_lock_map);
#endif
/* Data structures. */
#define RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(name) { \
.level = { &name.node[0] }, \
.levelcnt = { \
NUM_RCU_LVL_0, /* root of hierarchy. */ \
NUM_RCU_LVL_1, \
NUM_RCU_LVL_2, \
NUM_RCU_LVL_3, /* == MAX_RCU_LVLS */ \
}, \
.signaled = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT, \
.gpnum = -300, \
.completed = -300, \
.onofflock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&name.onofflock), \
.fqslock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&name.fqslock), \
.n_force_qs = 0, \
.n_force_qs_ngp = 0, \
}
struct rcu_state rcu_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_state);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_data);
struct rcu_state rcu_bh_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_bh_state);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_bh_data);
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_dynticks, rcu_dynticks) = {
.dynticks_nesting = 1,
.dynticks = 1,
};
"Tree RCU": scalable classic RCU implementation This patch fixes a long-standing performance bug in classic RCU that results in massive internal-to-RCU lock contention on systems with more than a few hundred CPUs. Although this patch creates a separate flavor of RCU for ease of review and patch maintenance, it is intended to replace classic RCU. This patch still handles stress better than does mainline, so I am still calling it ready for inclusion. This patch is against the -tip tree. Nevertheless, experience on an actual 1000+ CPU machine would still be most welcome. Most of the changes noted below were found while creating an rcutiny (which should permit ejecting the current rcuclassic) and while doing detailed line-by-line documentation. Updates from v9 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/2/334): o Fixes from remainder of line-by-line code walkthrough, including comment spelling, initialization, undesirable narrowing due to type conversion, removing redundant memory barriers, removing redundant local-variable initialization, and removing redundant local variables. I do not believe that any of these fixes address the CPU-hotplug issues that Andi Kleen was seeing, but please do give it a whirl in case the machine is smarter than I am. A writeup from the walkthrough may be found at the following URL, in case you are suffering from terminal insomnia or masochism: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/paulmck/tmp/rcutree-walkthrough.2008.12.16a.pdf o Made rcutree tracing use seq_file, as suggested some time ago by Lai Jiangshan. o Added a .csv variant of the rcudata debugfs trace file, to allow people having thousands of CPUs to drop the data into a spreadsheet. Tested with oocalc and gnumeric. Updated documentation to suit. Updates from v8 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/15/139): o Fix a theoretical race between grace-period initialization and force_quiescent_state() that could occur if more than three jiffies were required to carry out the grace-period initialization. Which it might, if you had enough CPUs. o Apply Ingo's printk-standardization patch. o Substitute local variables for repeated accesses to global variables. o Fix comment misspellings and redundant (but harmless) increments of ->n_rcu_pending (this latter after having explicitly added it). o Apply checkpatch fixes. Updates from v7 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/10/291): o Fixed a number of problems noted by Gautham Shenoy, including the cpu-stall-detection bug that he was having difficulty convincing me was real. ;-) o Changed cpu-stall detection to wait for ten seconds rather than three in order to reduce false positive, as suggested by Ingo Molnar. o Produced a design document (http://lwn.net/Articles/305782/). The act of writing this document uncovered a number of both theoretical and "here and now" bugs as noted below. o Fix dynticks_nesting accounting confusion, simplify WARN_ON() condition, fix kerneldoc comments, and add memory barriers in dynticks interface functions. o Add more data to tracing. o Remove unused "rcu_barrier" field from rcu_data structure. o Count calls to rcu_pending() from scheduling-clock interrupt to use as a surrogate timebase should jiffies stop counting. o Fix a theoretical race between force_quiescent_state() and grace-period initialization. Yes, initialization does have to go on for some jiffies for this race to occur, but given enough CPUs... Updates from v6 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/23/448): o Fix a number of checkpatch.pl complaints. o Apply review comments from Ingo Molnar and Lai Jiangshan on the stall-detection code. o Fix several bugs in !CONFIG_SMP builds. o Fix a misspelled config-parameter name so that RCU now announces at boot time if stall detection is configured. o Run tests on numerous combinations of configurations parameters, which after the fixes above, now build and run correctly. Updates from v5 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/15/92, bad subject line): o Fix a compiler error in the !CONFIG_FANOUT_EXACT case (blew a changeset some time ago, and finally got around to retesting this option). o Fix some tracing bugs in rcupreempt that caused incorrect totals to be printed. o I now test with a more brutal random-selection online/offline script (attached). Probably more brutal than it needs to be on the people reading it as well, but so it goes. o A number of optimizations and usability improvements: o Make rcu_pending() ignore the grace-period timeout when there is no grace period in progress. o Make force_quiescent_state() avoid going for a global lock in the case where there is no grace period in progress. o Rearrange struct fields to improve struct layout. o Make call_rcu() initiate a grace period if RCU was idle, rather than waiting for the next scheduling clock interrupt. o Invoke rcu_irq_enter() and rcu_irq_exit() only when idle, as suggested by Andi Kleen. I still don't completely trust this change, and might back it out. o Make CONFIG_RCU_TRACE be the single config variable manipulated for all forms of RCU, instead of the prior confusion. o Document tracing files and formats for both rcupreempt and rcutree. Updates from v4 for those missing v5 given its bad subject line: o Separated dynticks interface so that NMIs and irqs call separate functions, greatly simplifying it. In particular, this code no longer requires a proof of correctness. ;-) o Separated dynticks state out into its own per-CPU structure, avoiding the duplicated accounting. o The case where a dynticks-idle CPU runs an irq handler that invokes call_rcu() is now correctly handled, forcing that CPU out of dynticks-idle mode. o Review comments have been applied (thank you all!!!). For but one example, fixed the dynticks-ordering issue that Manfred pointed out, saving me much debugging. ;-) o Adjusted rcuclassic and rcupreempt to handle dynticks changes. Attached is an updated patch to Classic RCU that applies a hierarchy, greatly reducing the contention on the top-level lock for large machines. This passes 10-hour concurrent rcutorture and online-offline testing on 128-CPU ppc64 without dynticks enabled, and exposes some timekeeping bugs in presence of dynticks (exciting working on a system where "sleep 1" hangs until interrupted...), which were fixed in the 2.6.27 kernel. It is getting more reliable than mainline by some measures, so the next version will be against -tip for inclusion. See also Manfred Spraul's recent patches (or his earlier work from 2004 at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=108546384711797&w=2). We will converge onto a common patch in the fullness of time, but are currently exploring different regions of the design space. That said, I have already gratefully stolen quite a few of Manfred's ideas. This patch provides CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, which controls the bushiness of the RCU hierarchy. Defaults to 32 on 32-bit machines and 64 on 64-bit machines. If CONFIG_NR_CPUS is less than CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, there is no hierarchy. By default, the RCU initialization code will adjust CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT to balance the hierarchy, so strongly NUMA architectures may choose to set CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT to disable this balancing, allowing the hierarchy to be exactly aligned to the underlying hardware. Up to two levels of hierarchy are permitted (in addition to the root node), allowing up to 16,384 CPUs on 32-bit systems and up to 262,144 CPUs on 64-bit systems. I just know that I am going to regret saying this, but this seems more than sufficient for the foreseeable future. (Some architectures might wish to set CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=4, which would limit such architectures to 64 CPUs. If this becomes a real problem, additional levels can be added, but I doubt that it will make a significant difference on real hardware.) In the common case, a given CPU will manipulate its private rcu_data structure and the rcu_node structure that it shares with its immediate neighbors. This can reduce both lock and memory contention by multiple orders of magnitude, which should eliminate the need for the strange manipulations that are reported to be required when running Linux on very large systems. Some shortcomings: o More bugs will probably surface as a result of an ongoing line-by-line code inspection. Patches will be provided as required. o There are probably hangs, rcutorture failures, &c. Seems quite stable on a 128-CPU machine, but that is kind of small compared to 4096 CPUs. However, seems to do better than mainline. Patches will be provided as required. o The memory footprint of this version is several KB larger than rcuclassic. A separate UP-only rcutiny patch will be provided, which will reduce the memory footprint significantly, even compared to the old rcuclassic. One such patch passes light testing, and has a memory footprint smaller even than rcuclassic. Initial reaction from various embedded guys was "it is not worth it", so am putting it aside. Credits: o Manfred Spraul for ideas, review comments, and bugs spotted, as well as some good friendly competition. ;-) o Josh Triplett, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan, Andi Kleen, Andy Whitcroft, and Andrew Morton for reviews and comments. o Thomas Gleixner for much-needed help with some timer issues (see patches below). o Jon M. Tollefson, Tim Pepper, Andrew Theurer, Jose R. Santos, Andy Whitcroft, Darrick Wong, Nishanth Aravamudan, Anton Blanchard, Dave Kleikamp, and Nathan Lynch for keeping machines alive despite my heavy abuse^Wtesting. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-12-19 04:55:32 +08:00
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ */
static int blimit = 10; /* Maximum callbacks per softirq. */
static int qhimark = 10000; /* If this many pending, ignore blimit. */
static int qlowmark = 100; /* Once only this many pending, use blimit. */
static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed);
/*
* Return the number of RCU batches processed thus far for debug & stats.
*/
long rcu_batches_completed(void)
{
return rcu_state.completed;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_batches_completed);
/*
* Return the number of RCU BH batches processed thus far for debug & stats.
*/
long rcu_batches_completed_bh(void)
{
return rcu_bh_state.completed;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_batches_completed_bh);
/*
* Does the CPU have callbacks ready to be invoked?
*/
static int
cpu_has_callbacks_ready_to_invoke(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
return &rdp->nxtlist != rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL];
}
/*
* Does the current CPU require a yet-as-unscheduled grace period?
*/
static int
cpu_needs_another_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
/* ACCESS_ONCE() because we are accessing outside of lock. */
return *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] &&
ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->completed) == ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gpnum);
}
/*
* Return the root node of the specified rcu_state structure.
*/
static struct rcu_node *rcu_get_root(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
return &rsp->node[0];
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* If the specified CPU is offline, tell the caller that it is in
* a quiescent state. Otherwise, whack it with a reschedule IPI.
* Grace periods can end up waiting on an offline CPU when that
* CPU is in the process of coming online -- it will be added to the
* rcu_node bitmasks before it actually makes it online. The same thing
* can happen while a CPU is in the process of coming online. Because this
* race is quite rare, we check for it after detecting that the grace
* period has been delayed rather than checking each and every CPU
* each and every time we start a new grace period.
*/
static int rcu_implicit_offline_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
/*
* If the CPU is offline, it is in a quiescent state. We can
* trust its state not to change because interrupts are disabled.
*/
if (cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu)) {
rdp->offline_fqs++;
return 1;
}
/* The CPU is online, so send it a reschedule IPI. */
if (rdp->cpu != smp_processor_id())
smp_send_reschedule(rdp->cpu);
else
set_need_resched();
rdp->resched_ipi++;
return 0;
}
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_SMP */
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rcu_rs, 10 * HZ, 5);
/**
* rcu_enter_nohz - inform RCU that current CPU is entering nohz
*
* Enter nohz mode, in other words, -leave- the mode in which RCU
* read-side critical sections can occur. (Though RCU read-side
* critical sections can occur in irq handlers in nohz mode, a possibility
* handled by rcu_irq_enter() and rcu_irq_exit()).
*/
void rcu_enter_nohz(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp;
smp_mb(); /* CPUs seeing ++ must see prior RCU read-side crit sects */
local_irq_save(flags);
rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
rdtp->dynticks++;
rdtp->dynticks_nesting--;
WARN_ON_RATELIMIT(rdtp->dynticks & 0x1, &rcu_rs);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/*
* rcu_exit_nohz - inform RCU that current CPU is leaving nohz
*
* Exit nohz mode, in other words, -enter- the mode in which RCU
* read-side critical sections normally occur.
*/
void rcu_exit_nohz(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp;
local_irq_save(flags);
rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
rdtp->dynticks++;
rdtp->dynticks_nesting++;
WARN_ON_RATELIMIT(!(rdtp->dynticks & 0x1), &rcu_rs);
local_irq_restore(flags);
smp_mb(); /* CPUs seeing ++ must see later RCU read-side crit sects */
}
/**
* rcu_nmi_enter - inform RCU of entry to NMI context
*
* If the CPU was idle with dynamic ticks active, and there is no
* irq handler running, this updates rdtp->dynticks_nmi to let the
* RCU grace-period handling know that the CPU is active.
*/
void rcu_nmi_enter(void)
{
struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
if (rdtp->dynticks & 0x1)
return;
rdtp->dynticks_nmi++;
WARN_ON_RATELIMIT(!(rdtp->dynticks_nmi & 0x1), &rcu_rs);
smp_mb(); /* CPUs seeing ++ must see later RCU read-side crit sects */
}
/**
* rcu_nmi_exit - inform RCU of exit from NMI context
*
* If the CPU was idle with dynamic ticks active, and there is no
* irq handler running, this updates rdtp->dynticks_nmi to let the
* RCU grace-period handling know that the CPU is no longer active.
*/
void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
{
struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
if (rdtp->dynticks & 0x1)
return;
smp_mb(); /* CPUs seeing ++ must see prior RCU read-side crit sects */
rdtp->dynticks_nmi++;
WARN_ON_RATELIMIT(rdtp->dynticks_nmi & 0x1, &rcu_rs);
}
/**
* rcu_irq_enter - inform RCU of entry to hard irq context
*
* If the CPU was idle with dynamic ticks active, this updates the
* rdtp->dynticks to let the RCU handling know that the CPU is active.
*/
void rcu_irq_enter(void)
{
struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
if (rdtp->dynticks_nesting++)
return;
rdtp->dynticks++;
WARN_ON_RATELIMIT(!(rdtp->dynticks & 0x1), &rcu_rs);
smp_mb(); /* CPUs seeing ++ must see later RCU read-side crit sects */
}
/**
* rcu_irq_exit - inform RCU of exit from hard irq context
*
* If the CPU was idle with dynamic ticks active, update the rdp->dynticks
* to put let the RCU handling be aware that the CPU is going back to idle
* with no ticks.
*/
void rcu_irq_exit(void)
{
struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
if (--rdtp->dynticks_nesting)
return;
smp_mb(); /* CPUs seeing ++ must see prior RCU read-side crit sects */
rdtp->dynticks++;
WARN_ON_RATELIMIT(rdtp->dynticks & 0x1, &rcu_rs);
/* If the interrupt queued a callback, get out of dyntick mode. */
if (__get_cpu_var(rcu_data).nxtlist ||
__get_cpu_var(rcu_bh_data).nxtlist)
set_need_resched();
}
/*
* Record the specified "completed" value, which is later used to validate
* dynticks counter manipulations. Specify "rsp->completed - 1" to
* unconditionally invalidate any future dynticks manipulations (which is
* useful at the beginning of a grace period).
*/
static void dyntick_record_completed(struct rcu_state *rsp, long comp)
{
rsp->dynticks_completed = comp;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* Recall the previously recorded value of the completion for dynticks.
*/
static long dyntick_recall_completed(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
return rsp->dynticks_completed;
}
/*
* Snapshot the specified CPU's dynticks counter so that we can later
* credit them with an implicit quiescent state. Return 1 if this CPU
* is already in a quiescent state courtesy of dynticks idle mode.
*/
static int dyntick_save_progress_counter(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
int ret;
int snap;
int snap_nmi;
snap = rdp->dynticks->dynticks;
snap_nmi = rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nmi;
smp_mb(); /* Order sampling of snap with end of grace period. */
rdp->dynticks_snap = snap;
rdp->dynticks_nmi_snap = snap_nmi;
ret = ((snap & 0x1) == 0) && ((snap_nmi & 0x1) == 0);
if (ret)
rdp->dynticks_fqs++;
return ret;
}
/*
* Return true if the specified CPU has passed through a quiescent
* state by virtue of being in or having passed through an dynticks
* idle state since the last call to dyntick_save_progress_counter()
* for this same CPU.
*/
static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
long curr;
long curr_nmi;
long snap;
long snap_nmi;
curr = rdp->dynticks->dynticks;
snap = rdp->dynticks_snap;
curr_nmi = rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nmi;
snap_nmi = rdp->dynticks_nmi_snap;
smp_mb(); /* force ordering with cpu entering/leaving dynticks. */
/*
* If the CPU passed through or entered a dynticks idle phase with
* no active irq/NMI handlers, then we can safely pretend that the CPU
* already acknowledged the request to pass through a quiescent
* state. Either way, that CPU cannot possibly be in an RCU
* read-side critical section that started before the beginning
* of the current RCU grace period.
*/
if ((curr != snap || (curr & 0x1) == 0) &&
(curr_nmi != snap_nmi || (curr_nmi & 0x1) == 0)) {
rdp->dynticks_fqs++;
return 1;
}
/* Go check for the CPU being offline. */
return rcu_implicit_offline_qs(rdp);
}
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_SMP */
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ */
static void dyntick_record_completed(struct rcu_state *rsp, long comp)
{
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* If there are no dynticks, then the only way that a CPU can passively
* be in a quiescent state is to be offline. Unlike dynticks idle, which
* is a point in time during the prior (already finished) grace period,
* an offline CPU is always in a quiescent state, and thus can be
* unconditionally applied. So just return the current value of completed.
*/
static long dyntick_recall_completed(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
return rsp->completed;
}
static int dyntick_save_progress_counter(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
return 0;
}
static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
return rcu_implicit_offline_qs(rdp);
}
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_SMP */
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ */
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR
static void record_gp_stall_check_time(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
rsp->gp_start = jiffies;
rsp->jiffies_stall = jiffies + RCU_SECONDS_TILL_STALL_CHECK;
}
static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
int cpu;
long delta;
unsigned long flags;
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
struct rcu_node *rnp_cur = rsp->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1];
struct rcu_node *rnp_end = &rsp->node[NUM_RCU_NODES];
/* Only let one CPU complain about others per time interval. */
spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
delta = jiffies - rsp->jiffies_stall;
if (delta < RCU_STALL_RAT_DELAY || rsp->gpnum == rsp->completed) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
return;
}
rsp->jiffies_stall = jiffies + RCU_SECONDS_TILL_STALL_RECHECK;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
/* OK, time to rat on our buddy... */
printk(KERN_ERR "INFO: RCU detected CPU stalls:");
for (; rnp_cur < rnp_end; rnp_cur++) {
if (rnp_cur->qsmask == 0)
continue;
for (cpu = 0; cpu <= rnp_cur->grphi - rnp_cur->grplo; cpu++)
if (rnp_cur->qsmask & (1UL << cpu))
printk(" %d", rnp_cur->grplo + cpu);
}
printk(" (detected by %d, t=%ld jiffies)\n",
smp_processor_id(), (long)(jiffies - rsp->gp_start));
force_quiescent_state(rsp, 0); /* Kick them all. */
}
static void print_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
printk(KERN_ERR "INFO: RCU detected CPU %d stall (t=%lu jiffies)\n",
smp_processor_id(), jiffies - rsp->gp_start);
dump_stack();
spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
if ((long)(jiffies - rsp->jiffies_stall) >= 0)
rsp->jiffies_stall =
jiffies + RCU_SECONDS_TILL_STALL_RECHECK;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
set_need_resched(); /* kick ourselves to get things going. */
}
static void check_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
long delta;
struct rcu_node *rnp;
delta = jiffies - rsp->jiffies_stall;
rnp = rdp->mynode;
if ((rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask) && delta >= 0) {
/* We haven't checked in, so go dump stack. */
print_cpu_stall(rsp);
} else if (rsp->gpnum != rsp->completed &&
delta >= RCU_STALL_RAT_DELAY) {
/* They had two time units to dump stack, so complain. */
print_other_cpu_stall(rsp);
}
}
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR */
static void record_gp_stall_check_time(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
}
static void check_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
}
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR */
/*
* Update CPU-local rcu_data state to record the newly noticed grace period.
* This is used both when we started the grace period and when we notice
* that someone else started the grace period.
*/
static void note_new_gpnum(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
rdp->qs_pending = 1;
rdp->passed_quiesc = 0;
rdp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
rdp->n_rcu_pending_force_qs = rdp->n_rcu_pending +
RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
}
/*
* Did someone else start a new RCU grace period start since we last
* checked? Update local state appropriately if so. Must be called
* on the CPU corresponding to rdp.
*/
static int
check_for_new_grace_period(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
local_irq_save(flags);
if (rdp->gpnum != rsp->gpnum) {
note_new_gpnum(rsp, rdp);
ret = 1;
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
return ret;
}
/*
* Start a new RCU grace period if warranted, re-initializing the hierarchy
* in preparation for detecting the next grace period. The caller must hold
* the root node's ->lock, which is released before return. Hard irqs must
* be disabled.
*/
static void
rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
__releases(rcu_get_root(rsp)->lock)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp = rsp->rda[smp_processor_id()];
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
struct rcu_node *rnp_cur;
struct rcu_node *rnp_end;
if (!cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
return;
}
/* Advance to a new grace period and initialize state. */
rsp->gpnum++;
rsp->signaled = RCU_GP_INIT; /* Hold off force_quiescent_state. */
rsp->jiffies_force_qs = jiffies + RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
rdp->n_rcu_pending_force_qs = rdp->n_rcu_pending +
RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
record_gp_stall_check_time(rsp);
dyntick_record_completed(rsp, rsp->completed - 1);
note_new_gpnum(rsp, rdp);
/*
* Because we are first, we know that all our callbacks will
* be covered by this upcoming grace period, even the ones
* that were registered arbitrarily recently.
*/
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL] = rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL];
rdp->nxttail[RCU_WAIT_TAIL] = rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL];
/* Special-case the common single-level case. */
if (NUM_RCU_NODES == 1) {
rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
rsp->signaled = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT; /* force_quiescent_state OK. */
"Tree RCU": scalable classic RCU implementation This patch fixes a long-standing performance bug in classic RCU that results in massive internal-to-RCU lock contention on systems with more than a few hundred CPUs. Although this patch creates a separate flavor of RCU for ease of review and patch maintenance, it is intended to replace classic RCU. This patch still handles stress better than does mainline, so I am still calling it ready for inclusion. This patch is against the -tip tree. Nevertheless, experience on an actual 1000+ CPU machine would still be most welcome. Most of the changes noted below were found while creating an rcutiny (which should permit ejecting the current rcuclassic) and while doing detailed line-by-line documentation. Updates from v9 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/2/334): o Fixes from remainder of line-by-line code walkthrough, including comment spelling, initialization, undesirable narrowing due to type conversion, removing redundant memory barriers, removing redundant local-variable initialization, and removing redundant local variables. I do not believe that any of these fixes address the CPU-hotplug issues that Andi Kleen was seeing, but please do give it a whirl in case the machine is smarter than I am. A writeup from the walkthrough may be found at the following URL, in case you are suffering from terminal insomnia or masochism: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/paulmck/tmp/rcutree-walkthrough.2008.12.16a.pdf o Made rcutree tracing use seq_file, as suggested some time ago by Lai Jiangshan. o Added a .csv variant of the rcudata debugfs trace file, to allow people having thousands of CPUs to drop the data into a spreadsheet. Tested with oocalc and gnumeric. Updated documentation to suit. Updates from v8 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/15/139): o Fix a theoretical race between grace-period initialization and force_quiescent_state() that could occur if more than three jiffies were required to carry out the grace-period initialization. Which it might, if you had enough CPUs. o Apply Ingo's printk-standardization patch. o Substitute local variables for repeated accesses to global variables. o Fix comment misspellings and redundant (but harmless) increments of ->n_rcu_pending (this latter after having explicitly added it). o Apply checkpatch fixes. Updates from v7 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/10/291): o Fixed a number of problems noted by Gautham Shenoy, including the cpu-stall-detection bug that he was having difficulty convincing me was real. ;-) o Changed cpu-stall detection to wait for ten seconds rather than three in order to reduce false positive, as suggested by Ingo Molnar. o Produced a design document (http://lwn.net/Articles/305782/). The act of writing this document uncovered a number of both theoretical and "here and now" bugs as noted below. o Fix dynticks_nesting accounting confusion, simplify WARN_ON() condition, fix kerneldoc comments, and add memory barriers in dynticks interface functions. o Add more data to tracing. o Remove unused "rcu_barrier" field from rcu_data structure. o Count calls to rcu_pending() from scheduling-clock interrupt to use as a surrogate timebase should jiffies stop counting. o Fix a theoretical race between force_quiescent_state() and grace-period initialization. Yes, initialization does have to go on for some jiffies for this race to occur, but given enough CPUs... Updates from v6 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/23/448): o Fix a number of checkpatch.pl complaints. o Apply review comments from Ingo Molnar and Lai Jiangshan on the stall-detection code. o Fix several bugs in !CONFIG_SMP builds. o Fix a misspelled config-parameter name so that RCU now announces at boot time if stall detection is configured. o Run tests on numerous combinations of configurations parameters, which after the fixes above, now build and run correctly. Updates from v5 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/15/92, bad subject line): o Fix a compiler error in the !CONFIG_FANOUT_EXACT case (blew a changeset some time ago, and finally got around to retesting this option). o Fix some tracing bugs in rcupreempt that caused incorrect totals to be printed. o I now test with a more brutal random-selection online/offline script (attached). Probably more brutal than it needs to be on the people reading it as well, but so it goes. o A number of optimizations and usability improvements: o Make rcu_pending() ignore the grace-period timeout when there is no grace period in progress. o Make force_quiescent_state() avoid going for a global lock in the case where there is no grace period in progress. o Rearrange struct fields to improve struct layout. o Make call_rcu() initiate a grace period if RCU was idle, rather than waiting for the next scheduling clock interrupt. o Invoke rcu_irq_enter() and rcu_irq_exit() only when idle, as suggested by Andi Kleen. I still don't completely trust this change, and might back it out. o Make CONFIG_RCU_TRACE be the single config variable manipulated for all forms of RCU, instead of the prior confusion. o Document tracing files and formats for both rcupreempt and rcutree. Updates from v4 for those missing v5 given its bad subject line: o Separated dynticks interface so that NMIs and irqs call separate functions, greatly simplifying it. In particular, this code no longer requires a proof of correctness. ;-) o Separated dynticks state out into its own per-CPU structure, avoiding the duplicated accounting. o The case where a dynticks-idle CPU runs an irq handler that invokes call_rcu() is now correctly handled, forcing that CPU out of dynticks-idle mode. o Review comments have been applied (thank you all!!!). For but one example, fixed the dynticks-ordering issue that Manfred pointed out, saving me much debugging. ;-) o Adjusted rcuclassic and rcupreempt to handle dynticks changes. Attached is an updated patch to Classic RCU that applies a hierarchy, greatly reducing the contention on the top-level lock for large machines. This passes 10-hour concurrent rcutorture and online-offline testing on 128-CPU ppc64 without dynticks enabled, and exposes some timekeeping bugs in presence of dynticks (exciting working on a system where "sleep 1" hangs until interrupted...), which were fixed in the 2.6.27 kernel. It is getting more reliable than mainline by some measures, so the next version will be against -tip for inclusion. See also Manfred Spraul's recent patches (or his earlier work from 2004 at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=108546384711797&w=2). We will converge onto a common patch in the fullness of time, but are currently exploring different regions of the design space. That said, I have already gratefully stolen quite a few of Manfred's ideas. This patch provides CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, which controls the bushiness of the RCU hierarchy. Defaults to 32 on 32-bit machines and 64 on 64-bit machines. If CONFIG_NR_CPUS is less than CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, there is no hierarchy. By default, the RCU initialization code will adjust CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT to balance the hierarchy, so strongly NUMA architectures may choose to set CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT to disable this balancing, allowing the hierarchy to be exactly aligned to the underlying hardware. Up to two levels of hierarchy are permitted (in addition to the root node), allowing up to 16,384 CPUs on 32-bit systems and up to 262,144 CPUs on 64-bit systems. I just know that I am going to regret saying this, but this seems more than sufficient for the foreseeable future. (Some architectures might wish to set CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=4, which would limit such architectures to 64 CPUs. If this becomes a real problem, additional levels can be added, but I doubt that it will make a significant difference on real hardware.) In the common case, a given CPU will manipulate its private rcu_data structure and the rcu_node structure that it shares with its immediate neighbors. This can reduce both lock and memory contention by multiple orders of magnitude, which should eliminate the need for the strange manipulations that are reported to be required when running Linux on very large systems. Some shortcomings: o More bugs will probably surface as a result of an ongoing line-by-line code inspection. Patches will be provided as required. o There are probably hangs, rcutorture failures, &c. Seems quite stable on a 128-CPU machine, but that is kind of small compared to 4096 CPUs. However, seems to do better than mainline. Patches will be provided as required. o The memory footprint of this version is several KB larger than rcuclassic. A separate UP-only rcutiny patch will be provided, which will reduce the memory footprint significantly, even compared to the old rcuclassic. One such patch passes light testing, and has a memory footprint smaller even than rcuclassic. Initial reaction from various embedded guys was "it is not worth it", so am putting it aside. Credits: o Manfred Spraul for ideas, review comments, and bugs spotted, as well as some good friendly competition. ;-) o Josh Triplett, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan, Andi Kleen, Andy Whitcroft, and Andrew Morton for reviews and comments. o Thomas Gleixner for much-needed help with some timer issues (see patches below). o Jon M. Tollefson, Tim Pepper, Andrew Theurer, Jose R. Santos, Andy Whitcroft, Darrick Wong, Nishanth Aravamudan, Anton Blanchard, Dave Kleikamp, and Nathan Lynch for keeping machines alive despite my heavy abuse^Wtesting. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-12-19 04:55:32 +08:00
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
return;
}
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* leave irqs disabled. */
/* Exclude any concurrent CPU-hotplug operations. */
spin_lock(&rsp->onofflock); /* irqs already disabled. */
/*
* Set the quiescent-state-needed bits in all the non-leaf RCU
* nodes for all currently online CPUs. This operation relies
* on the layout of the hierarchy within the rsp->node[] array.
* Note that other CPUs will access only the leaves of the
* hierarchy, which still indicate that no grace period is in
* progress. In addition, we have excluded CPU-hotplug operations.
*
* We therefore do not need to hold any locks. Any required
* memory barriers will be supplied by the locks guarding the
* leaf rcu_nodes in the hierarchy.
*/
rnp_end = rsp->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1];
for (rnp_cur = &rsp->node[0]; rnp_cur < rnp_end; rnp_cur++)
rnp_cur->qsmask = rnp_cur->qsmaskinit;
/*
* Now set up the leaf nodes. Here we must be careful. First,
* we need to hold the lock in order to exclude other CPUs, which
* might be contending for the leaf nodes' locks. Second, as
* soon as we initialize a given leaf node, its CPUs might run
* up the rest of the hierarchy. We must therefore acquire locks
* for each node that we touch during this stage. (But we still
* are excluding CPU-hotplug operations.)
*
* Note that the grace period cannot complete until we finish
* the initialization process, as there will be at least one
* qsmask bit set in the root node until that time, namely the
* one corresponding to this CPU.
*/
rnp_end = &rsp->node[NUM_RCU_NODES];
rnp_cur = rsp->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1];
for (; rnp_cur < rnp_end; rnp_cur++) {
spin_lock(&rnp_cur->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
rnp_cur->qsmask = rnp_cur->qsmaskinit;
spin_unlock(&rnp_cur->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
}
rsp->signaled = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT; /* force_quiescent_state now OK. */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
}
/*
* Advance this CPU's callbacks, but only if the current grace period
* has ended. This may be called only from the CPU to whom the rdp
* belongs.
*/
static void
rcu_process_gp_end(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
long completed_snap;
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
completed_snap = ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->completed); /* outside of lock. */
/* Did another grace period end? */
if (rdp->completed != completed_snap) {
/* Advance callbacks. No harm if list empty. */
rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] = rdp->nxttail[RCU_WAIT_TAIL];
rdp->nxttail[RCU_WAIT_TAIL] = rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL];
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL] = rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL];
/* Remember that we saw this grace-period completion. */
rdp->completed = completed_snap;
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/*
* Similar to cpu_quiet(), for which it is a helper function. Allows
* a group of CPUs to be quieted at one go, though all the CPUs in the
* group must be represented by the same leaf rcu_node structure.
* That structure's lock must be held upon entry, and it is released
* before return.
*/
static void
cpu_quiet_msk(unsigned long mask, struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
unsigned long flags)
__releases(rnp->lock)
{
/* Walk up the rcu_node hierarchy. */
for (;;) {
if (!(rnp->qsmask & mask)) {
/* Our bit has already been cleared, so done. */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
return;
}
rnp->qsmask &= ~mask;
if (rnp->qsmask != 0) {
/* Other bits still set at this level, so done. */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
return;
}
mask = rnp->grpmask;
if (rnp->parent == NULL) {
/* No more levels. Exit loop holding root lock. */
break;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
rnp = rnp->parent;
spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
}
/*
* Get here if we are the last CPU to pass through a quiescent
* state for this grace period. Clean up and let rcu_start_gp()
* start up the next grace period if one is needed. Note that
* we still hold rnp->lock, as required by rcu_start_gp(), which
* will release it.
*/
rsp->completed = rsp->gpnum;
rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rsp->rda[smp_processor_id()]);
rcu_start_gp(rsp, flags); /* releases rnp->lock. */
}
/*
* Record a quiescent state for the specified CPU, which must either be
* the current CPU or an offline CPU. The lastcomp argument is used to
* make sure we are still in the grace period of interest. We don't want
* to end the current grace period based on quiescent states detected in
* an earlier grace period!
*/
static void
cpu_quiet(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp, long lastcomp)
{
unsigned long flags;
unsigned long mask;
struct rcu_node *rnp;
rnp = rdp->mynode;
spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
if (lastcomp != ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->completed)) {
/*
* Someone beat us to it for this grace period, so leave.
* The race with GP start is resolved by the fact that we
* hold the leaf rcu_node lock, so that the per-CPU bits
* cannot yet be initialized -- so we would simply find our
* CPU's bit already cleared in cpu_quiet_msk() if this race
* occurred.
*/
rdp->passed_quiesc = 0; /* try again later! */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
return;
}
mask = rdp->grpmask;
if ((rnp->qsmask & mask) == 0) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
} else {
rdp->qs_pending = 0;
/*
* This GP can't end until cpu checks in, so all of our
* callbacks can be processed during the next GP.
*/
rdp = rsp->rda[smp_processor_id()];
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL] = rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL];
cpu_quiet_msk(mask, rsp, rnp, flags); /* releases rnp->lock */
}
}
/*
* Check to see if there is a new grace period of which this CPU
* is not yet aware, and if so, set up local rcu_data state for it.
* Otherwise, see if this CPU has just passed through its first
* quiescent state for this grace period, and record that fact if so.
*/
static void
rcu_check_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
/* If there is now a new grace period, record and return. */
if (check_for_new_grace_period(rsp, rdp))
return;
/*
* Does this CPU still need to do its part for current grace period?
* If no, return and let the other CPUs do their part as well.
*/
if (!rdp->qs_pending)
return;
/*
* Was there a quiescent state since the beginning of the grace
* period? If no, then exit and wait for the next call.
*/
if (!rdp->passed_quiesc)
return;
/* Tell RCU we are done (but cpu_quiet() will be the judge of that). */
cpu_quiet(rdp->cpu, rsp, rdp, rdp->passed_quiesc_completed);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
/*
* Remove the outgoing CPU from the bitmasks in the rcu_node hierarchy
* and move all callbacks from the outgoing CPU to the current one.
*/
static void __rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
int i;
unsigned long flags;
long lastcomp;
unsigned long mask;
struct rcu_data *rdp = rsp->rda[cpu];
struct rcu_data *rdp_me;
struct rcu_node *rnp;
/* Exclude any attempts to start a new grace period. */
spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
/* Remove the outgoing CPU from the masks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */
rnp = rdp->mynode;
mask = rdp->grpmask; /* rnp->grplo is constant. */
do {
spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
rnp->qsmaskinit &= ~mask;
if (rnp->qsmaskinit != 0) {
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
break;
}
mask = rnp->grpmask;
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
rnp = rnp->parent;
} while (rnp != NULL);
lastcomp = rsp->completed;
spin_unlock(&rsp->onofflock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
/* Being offline is a quiescent state, so go record it. */
cpu_quiet(cpu, rsp, rdp, lastcomp);
/*
* Move callbacks from the outgoing CPU to the running CPU.
* Note that the outgoing CPU is now quiscent, so it is now
* (uncharacteristically) safe to access it rcu_data structure.
* Note also that we must carefully retain the order of the
* outgoing CPU's callbacks in order for rcu_barrier() to work
* correctly. Finally, note that we start all the callbacks
* afresh, even those that have passed through a grace period
* and are therefore ready to invoke. The theory is that hotplug
* events are rare, and that if they are frequent enough to
* indefinitely delay callbacks, you have far worse things to
* be worrying about.
*/
rdp_me = rsp->rda[smp_processor_id()];
if (rdp->nxtlist != NULL) {
*rdp_me->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = rdp->nxtlist;
rdp_me->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL];
rdp->nxtlist = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < RCU_NEXT_SIZE; i++)
rdp->nxttail[i] = &rdp->nxtlist;
rdp_me->qlen += rdp->qlen;
rdp->qlen = 0;
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/*
* Remove the specified CPU from the RCU hierarchy and move any pending
* callbacks that it might have to the current CPU. This code assumes
* that at least one CPU in the system will remain running at all times.
* Any attempt to offline -all- CPUs is likely to strand RCU callbacks.
*/
static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
{
__rcu_offline_cpu(cpu, &rcu_state);
__rcu_offline_cpu(cpu, &rcu_bh_state);
}
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
{
}
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
/*
* Invoke any RCU callbacks that have made it to the end of their grace
* period. Thottle as specified by rdp->blimit.
*/
static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct rcu_head *next, *list, **tail;
int count;
/* If no callbacks are ready, just return.*/
if (!cpu_has_callbacks_ready_to_invoke(rdp))
return;
/*
* Extract the list of ready callbacks, disabling to prevent
* races with call_rcu() from interrupt handlers.
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
list = rdp->nxtlist;
rdp->nxtlist = *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL];
*rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] = NULL;
tail = rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL];
for (count = RCU_NEXT_SIZE - 1; count >= 0; count--)
if (rdp->nxttail[count] == rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL])
rdp->nxttail[count] = &rdp->nxtlist;
local_irq_restore(flags);
/* Invoke callbacks. */
count = 0;
while (list) {
next = list->next;
prefetch(next);
list->func(list);
list = next;
if (++count >= rdp->blimit)
break;
}
local_irq_save(flags);
/* Update count, and requeue any remaining callbacks. */
rdp->qlen -= count;
if (list != NULL) {
*tail = rdp->nxtlist;
rdp->nxtlist = list;
for (count = 0; count < RCU_NEXT_SIZE; count++)
if (&rdp->nxtlist == rdp->nxttail[count])
rdp->nxttail[count] = tail;
else
break;
}
/* Reinstate batch limit if we have worked down the excess. */
if (rdp->blimit == LONG_MAX && rdp->qlen <= qlowmark)
rdp->blimit = blimit;
local_irq_restore(flags);
/* Re-raise the RCU softirq if there are callbacks remaining. */
if (cpu_has_callbacks_ready_to_invoke(rdp))
raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
}
/*
* Check to see if this CPU is in a non-context-switch quiescent state
* (user mode or idle loop for rcu, non-softirq execution for rcu_bh).
* Also schedule the RCU softirq handler.
*
* This function must be called with hardirqs disabled. It is normally
* invoked from the scheduling-clock interrupt. If rcu_pending returns
* false, there is no point in invoking rcu_check_callbacks().
*/
void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
{
if (user ||
rcu: Teach RCU that idle task is not quiscent state at boot This patch fixes a bug located by Vegard Nossum with the aid of kmemcheck, updated based on review comments from Nick Piggin, Ingo Molnar, and Andrew Morton. And cleans up the variable-name and function-name language. ;-) The boot CPU runs in the context of its idle thread during boot-up. During this time, idle_cpu(0) will always return nonzero, which will fool Classic and Hierarchical RCU into deciding that a large chunk of the boot-up sequence is a big long quiescent state. This in turn causes RCU to prematurely end grace periods during this time. This patch changes the rcutree.c and rcuclassic.c rcu_check_callbacks() function to ignore the idle task as a quiescent state until the system has started up the scheduler in rest_init(), introducing a new non-API function rcu_idle_now_means_idle() to inform RCU of this transition. RCU maintains an internal rcu_idle_cpu_truthful variable to track this state, which is then used by rcu_check_callback() to determine if it should believe idle_cpu(). Because this patch has the effect of disallowing RCU grace periods during long stretches of the boot-up sequence, this patch also introduces Josh Triplett's UP-only optimization that makes synchronize_rcu() be a no-op if num_online_cpus() returns 1. This allows boot-time code that calls synchronize_rcu() to proceed normally. Note, however, that RCU callbacks registered by call_rcu() will likely queue up until later in the boot sequence. Although rcuclassic and rcutree can also use this same optimization after boot completes, rcupreempt must restrict its use of this optimization to the portion of the boot sequence before the scheduler starts up, given that an rcupreempt RCU read-side critical section may be preeempted. In addition, this patch takes Nick Piggin's suggestion to make the system_state global variable be __read_mostly. Changes since v4: o Changes the name of the introduced function and variable to be less emotional. ;-) Changes since v3: o WARN_ON(nr_context_switches() > 0) to verify that RCU switches out of boot-time mode before the first context switch, as suggested by Nick Piggin. Changes since v2: o Created rcu_blocking_is_gp() internal-to-RCU API that determines whether a call to synchronize_rcu() is itself a grace period. o The definition of rcu_blocking_is_gp() for rcuclassic and rcutree checks to see if but a single CPU is online. o The definition of rcu_blocking_is_gp() for rcupreempt checks to see both if but a single CPU is online and if the system is still in early boot. This allows rcupreempt to again work correctly if running on a single CPU after booting is complete. o Added check to rcupreempt's synchronize_sched() for there being but one online CPU. Tested all three variants both SMP and !SMP, booted fine, passed a short rcutorture test on both x86 and Power. Located-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Tested-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-02-26 10:03:42 +08:00
(idle_cpu(cpu) && rcu_scheduler_active &&
!in_softirq() && hardirq_count() <= (1 << HARDIRQ_SHIFT))) {
"Tree RCU": scalable classic RCU implementation This patch fixes a long-standing performance bug in classic RCU that results in massive internal-to-RCU lock contention on systems with more than a few hundred CPUs. Although this patch creates a separate flavor of RCU for ease of review and patch maintenance, it is intended to replace classic RCU. This patch still handles stress better than does mainline, so I am still calling it ready for inclusion. This patch is against the -tip tree. Nevertheless, experience on an actual 1000+ CPU machine would still be most welcome. Most of the changes noted below were found while creating an rcutiny (which should permit ejecting the current rcuclassic) and while doing detailed line-by-line documentation. Updates from v9 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/2/334): o Fixes from remainder of line-by-line code walkthrough, including comment spelling, initialization, undesirable narrowing due to type conversion, removing redundant memory barriers, removing redundant local-variable initialization, and removing redundant local variables. I do not believe that any of these fixes address the CPU-hotplug issues that Andi Kleen was seeing, but please do give it a whirl in case the machine is smarter than I am. A writeup from the walkthrough may be found at the following URL, in case you are suffering from terminal insomnia or masochism: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/paulmck/tmp/rcutree-walkthrough.2008.12.16a.pdf o Made rcutree tracing use seq_file, as suggested some time ago by Lai Jiangshan. o Added a .csv variant of the rcudata debugfs trace file, to allow people having thousands of CPUs to drop the data into a spreadsheet. Tested with oocalc and gnumeric. Updated documentation to suit. Updates from v8 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/15/139): o Fix a theoretical race between grace-period initialization and force_quiescent_state() that could occur if more than three jiffies were required to carry out the grace-period initialization. Which it might, if you had enough CPUs. o Apply Ingo's printk-standardization patch. o Substitute local variables for repeated accesses to global variables. o Fix comment misspellings and redundant (but harmless) increments of ->n_rcu_pending (this latter after having explicitly added it). o Apply checkpatch fixes. Updates from v7 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/10/291): o Fixed a number of problems noted by Gautham Shenoy, including the cpu-stall-detection bug that he was having difficulty convincing me was real. ;-) o Changed cpu-stall detection to wait for ten seconds rather than three in order to reduce false positive, as suggested by Ingo Molnar. o Produced a design document (http://lwn.net/Articles/305782/). The act of writing this document uncovered a number of both theoretical and "here and now" bugs as noted below. o Fix dynticks_nesting accounting confusion, simplify WARN_ON() condition, fix kerneldoc comments, and add memory barriers in dynticks interface functions. o Add more data to tracing. o Remove unused "rcu_barrier" field from rcu_data structure. o Count calls to rcu_pending() from scheduling-clock interrupt to use as a surrogate timebase should jiffies stop counting. o Fix a theoretical race between force_quiescent_state() and grace-period initialization. Yes, initialization does have to go on for some jiffies for this race to occur, but given enough CPUs... Updates from v6 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/23/448): o Fix a number of checkpatch.pl complaints. o Apply review comments from Ingo Molnar and Lai Jiangshan on the stall-detection code. o Fix several bugs in !CONFIG_SMP builds. o Fix a misspelled config-parameter name so that RCU now announces at boot time if stall detection is configured. o Run tests on numerous combinations of configurations parameters, which after the fixes above, now build and run correctly. Updates from v5 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/15/92, bad subject line): o Fix a compiler error in the !CONFIG_FANOUT_EXACT case (blew a changeset some time ago, and finally got around to retesting this option). o Fix some tracing bugs in rcupreempt that caused incorrect totals to be printed. o I now test with a more brutal random-selection online/offline script (attached). Probably more brutal than it needs to be on the people reading it as well, but so it goes. o A number of optimizations and usability improvements: o Make rcu_pending() ignore the grace-period timeout when there is no grace period in progress. o Make force_quiescent_state() avoid going for a global lock in the case where there is no grace period in progress. o Rearrange struct fields to improve struct layout. o Make call_rcu() initiate a grace period if RCU was idle, rather than waiting for the next scheduling clock interrupt. o Invoke rcu_irq_enter() and rcu_irq_exit() only when idle, as suggested by Andi Kleen. I still don't completely trust this change, and might back it out. o Make CONFIG_RCU_TRACE be the single config variable manipulated for all forms of RCU, instead of the prior confusion. o Document tracing files and formats for both rcupreempt and rcutree. Updates from v4 for those missing v5 given its bad subject line: o Separated dynticks interface so that NMIs and irqs call separate functions, greatly simplifying it. In particular, this code no longer requires a proof of correctness. ;-) o Separated dynticks state out into its own per-CPU structure, avoiding the duplicated accounting. o The case where a dynticks-idle CPU runs an irq handler that invokes call_rcu() is now correctly handled, forcing that CPU out of dynticks-idle mode. o Review comments have been applied (thank you all!!!). For but one example, fixed the dynticks-ordering issue that Manfred pointed out, saving me much debugging. ;-) o Adjusted rcuclassic and rcupreempt to handle dynticks changes. Attached is an updated patch to Classic RCU that applies a hierarchy, greatly reducing the contention on the top-level lock for large machines. This passes 10-hour concurrent rcutorture and online-offline testing on 128-CPU ppc64 without dynticks enabled, and exposes some timekeeping bugs in presence of dynticks (exciting working on a system where "sleep 1" hangs until interrupted...), which were fixed in the 2.6.27 kernel. It is getting more reliable than mainline by some measures, so the next version will be against -tip for inclusion. See also Manfred Spraul's recent patches (or his earlier work from 2004 at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=108546384711797&w=2). We will converge onto a common patch in the fullness of time, but are currently exploring different regions of the design space. That said, I have already gratefully stolen quite a few of Manfred's ideas. This patch provides CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, which controls the bushiness of the RCU hierarchy. Defaults to 32 on 32-bit machines and 64 on 64-bit machines. If CONFIG_NR_CPUS is less than CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, there is no hierarchy. By default, the RCU initialization code will adjust CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT to balance the hierarchy, so strongly NUMA architectures may choose to set CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT to disable this balancing, allowing the hierarchy to be exactly aligned to the underlying hardware. Up to two levels of hierarchy are permitted (in addition to the root node), allowing up to 16,384 CPUs on 32-bit systems and up to 262,144 CPUs on 64-bit systems. I just know that I am going to regret saying this, but this seems more than sufficient for the foreseeable future. (Some architectures might wish to set CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=4, which would limit such architectures to 64 CPUs. If this becomes a real problem, additional levels can be added, but I doubt that it will make a significant difference on real hardware.) In the common case, a given CPU will manipulate its private rcu_data structure and the rcu_node structure that it shares with its immediate neighbors. This can reduce both lock and memory contention by multiple orders of magnitude, which should eliminate the need for the strange manipulations that are reported to be required when running Linux on very large systems. Some shortcomings: o More bugs will probably surface as a result of an ongoing line-by-line code inspection. Patches will be provided as required. o There are probably hangs, rcutorture failures, &c. Seems quite stable on a 128-CPU machine, but that is kind of small compared to 4096 CPUs. However, seems to do better than mainline. Patches will be provided as required. o The memory footprint of this version is several KB larger than rcuclassic. A separate UP-only rcutiny patch will be provided, which will reduce the memory footprint significantly, even compared to the old rcuclassic. One such patch passes light testing, and has a memory footprint smaller even than rcuclassic. Initial reaction from various embedded guys was "it is not worth it", so am putting it aside. Credits: o Manfred Spraul for ideas, review comments, and bugs spotted, as well as some good friendly competition. ;-) o Josh Triplett, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan, Andi Kleen, Andy Whitcroft, and Andrew Morton for reviews and comments. o Thomas Gleixner for much-needed help with some timer issues (see patches below). o Jon M. Tollefson, Tim Pepper, Andrew Theurer, Jose R. Santos, Andy Whitcroft, Darrick Wong, Nishanth Aravamudan, Anton Blanchard, Dave Kleikamp, and Nathan Lynch for keeping machines alive despite my heavy abuse^Wtesting. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-12-19 04:55:32 +08:00
/*
* Get here if this CPU took its interrupt from user
* mode or from the idle loop, and if this is not a
* nested interrupt. In this case, the CPU is in
* a quiescent state, so count it.
*
* No memory barrier is required here because both
* rcu_qsctr_inc() and rcu_bh_qsctr_inc() reference
* only CPU-local variables that other CPUs neither
* access nor modify, at least not while the corresponding
* CPU is online.
*/
rcu_qsctr_inc(cpu);
rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
} else if (!in_softirq()) {
/*
* Get here if this CPU did not take its interrupt from
* softirq, in other words, if it is not interrupting
* a rcu_bh read-side critical section. This is an _bh
* critical section, so count it.
*/
rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
}
raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* Scan the leaf rcu_node structures, processing dyntick state for any that
* have not yet encountered a quiescent state, using the function specified.
* Returns 1 if the current grace period ends while scanning (possibly
* because we made it end).
*/
static int rcu_process_dyntick(struct rcu_state *rsp, long lastcomp,
int (*f)(struct rcu_data *))
{
unsigned long bit;
int cpu;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned long mask;
struct rcu_node *rnp_cur = rsp->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1];
struct rcu_node *rnp_end = &rsp->node[NUM_RCU_NODES];
for (; rnp_cur < rnp_end; rnp_cur++) {
mask = 0;
spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp_cur->lock, flags);
if (rsp->completed != lastcomp) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp_cur->lock, flags);
return 1;
}
if (rnp_cur->qsmask == 0) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp_cur->lock, flags);
continue;
}
cpu = rnp_cur->grplo;
bit = 1;
for (; cpu <= rnp_cur->grphi; cpu++, bit <<= 1) {
if ((rnp_cur->qsmask & bit) != 0 && f(rsp->rda[cpu]))
mask |= bit;
}
if (mask != 0 && rsp->completed == lastcomp) {
/* cpu_quiet_msk() releases rnp_cur->lock. */
cpu_quiet_msk(mask, rsp, rnp_cur, flags);
continue;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp_cur->lock, flags);
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Force quiescent states on reluctant CPUs, and also detect which
* CPUs are in dyntick-idle mode.
*/
static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
{
unsigned long flags;
long lastcomp;
struct rcu_data *rdp = rsp->rda[smp_processor_id()];
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
u8 signaled;
if (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->completed) == ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gpnum))
return; /* No grace period in progress, nothing to force. */
if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&rsp->fqslock, flags)) {
rsp->n_force_qs_lh++; /* Inexact, can lose counts. Tough! */
return; /* Someone else is already on the job. */
}
if (relaxed &&
(long)(rsp->jiffies_force_qs - jiffies) >= 0 &&
(rdp->n_rcu_pending_force_qs - rdp->n_rcu_pending) >= 0)
goto unlock_ret; /* no emergency and done recently. */
rsp->n_force_qs++;
spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
lastcomp = rsp->completed;
signaled = rsp->signaled;
rsp->jiffies_force_qs = jiffies + RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
rdp->n_rcu_pending_force_qs = rdp->n_rcu_pending +
RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
if (lastcomp == rsp->gpnum) {
rsp->n_force_qs_ngp++;
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
goto unlock_ret; /* no GP in progress, time updated. */
}
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
switch (signaled) {
case RCU_GP_INIT:
break; /* grace period still initializing, ignore. */
case RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK:
if (RCU_SIGNAL_INIT != RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK)
break; /* So gcc recognizes the dead code. */
/* Record dyntick-idle state. */
if (rcu_process_dyntick(rsp, lastcomp,
dyntick_save_progress_counter))
goto unlock_ret;
/* Update state, record completion counter. */
spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
if (lastcomp == rsp->completed) {
rsp->signaled = RCU_FORCE_QS;
dyntick_record_completed(rsp, lastcomp);
}
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
break;
case RCU_FORCE_QS:
/* Check dyntick-idle state, send IPI to laggarts. */
if (rcu_process_dyntick(rsp, dyntick_recall_completed(rsp),
rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs))
goto unlock_ret;
/* Leave state in case more forcing is required. */
break;
}
unlock_ret:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->fqslock, flags);
}
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_SMP */
static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
{
set_need_resched();
}
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_SMP */
/*
* This does the RCU processing work from softirq context for the
* specified rcu_state and rcu_data structures. This may be called
* only from the CPU to whom the rdp belongs.
*/
static void
__rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
unsigned long flags;
/*
* If an RCU GP has gone long enough, go check for dyntick
* idle CPUs and, if needed, send resched IPIs.
*/
if ((long)(ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->jiffies_force_qs) - jiffies) < 0 ||
(rdp->n_rcu_pending_force_qs - rdp->n_rcu_pending) < 0)
force_quiescent_state(rsp, 1);
/*
* Advance callbacks in response to end of earlier grace
* period that some other CPU ended.
*/
rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rdp);
/* Update RCU state based on any recent quiescent states. */
rcu_check_quiescent_state(rsp, rdp);
/* Does this CPU require a not-yet-started grace period? */
if (cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp)) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&rcu_get_root(rsp)->lock, flags);
rcu_start_gp(rsp, flags); /* releases above lock */
}
/* If there are callbacks ready, invoke them. */
rcu_do_batch(rdp);
}
/*
* Do softirq processing for the current CPU.
*/
static void rcu_process_callbacks(struct softirq_action *unused)
{
/*
* Memory references from any prior RCU read-side critical sections
* executed by the interrupted code must be seen before any RCU
* grace-period manipulations below.
*/
smp_mb(); /* See above block comment. */
__rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_state, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_data));
__rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_bh_state, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_bh_data));
/*
* Memory references from any later RCU read-side critical sections
* executed by the interrupted code must be seen after any RCU
* grace-period manipulations above.
*/
smp_mb(); /* See above block comment. */
}
static void
__call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu),
struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct rcu_data *rdp;
head->func = func;
head->next = NULL;
smp_mb(); /* Ensure RCU update seen before callback registry. */
/*
* Opportunistically note grace-period endings and beginnings.
* Note that we might see a beginning right after we see an
* end, but never vice versa, since this CPU has to pass through
* a quiescent state betweentimes.
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
rdp = rsp->rda[smp_processor_id()];
rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rdp);
check_for_new_grace_period(rsp, rdp);
/* Add the callback to our list. */
*rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = head;
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = &head->next;
/* Start a new grace period if one not already started. */
if (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->completed) == ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gpnum)) {
unsigned long nestflag;
struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rsp);
spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp_root->lock, nestflag);
rcu_start_gp(rsp, nestflag); /* releases rnp_root->lock. */
}
/* Force the grace period if too many callbacks or too long waiting. */
if (unlikely(++rdp->qlen > qhimark)) {
rdp->blimit = LONG_MAX;
force_quiescent_state(rsp, 0);
} else if ((long)(ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->jiffies_force_qs) - jiffies) < 0 ||
(rdp->n_rcu_pending_force_qs - rdp->n_rcu_pending) < 0)
force_quiescent_state(rsp, 1);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/*
* Queue an RCU callback for invocation after a grace period.
*/
void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))
{
__call_rcu(head, func, &rcu_state);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu);
/*
* Queue an RCU for invocation after a quicker grace period.
*/
void call_rcu_bh(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))
{
__call_rcu(head, func, &rcu_bh_state);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_bh);
/*
* Check to see if there is any immediate RCU-related work to be done
* by the current CPU, for the specified type of RCU, returning 1 if so.
* The checks are in order of increasing expense: checks that can be
* carried out against CPU-local state are performed first. However,
* we must check for CPU stalls first, else we might not get a chance.
*/
static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
rdp->n_rcu_pending++;
/* Check for CPU stalls, if enabled. */
check_cpu_stall(rsp, rdp);
/* Is the RCU core waiting for a quiescent state from this CPU? */
if (rdp->qs_pending)
return 1;
/* Does this CPU have callbacks ready to invoke? */
if (cpu_has_callbacks_ready_to_invoke(rdp))
return 1;
/* Has RCU gone idle with this CPU needing another grace period? */
if (cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp))
return 1;
/* Has another RCU grace period completed? */
if (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->completed) != rdp->completed) /* outside of lock */
return 1;
/* Has a new RCU grace period started? */
if (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gpnum) != rdp->gpnum) /* outside of lock */
return 1;
/* Has an RCU GP gone long enough to send resched IPIs &c? */
if (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->completed) != ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gpnum) &&
((long)(ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->jiffies_force_qs) - jiffies) < 0 ||
(rdp->n_rcu_pending_force_qs - rdp->n_rcu_pending) < 0))
return 1;
/* nothing to do */
return 0;
}
/*
* Check to see if there is any immediate RCU-related work to be done
* by the current CPU, returning 1 if so. This function is part of the
* RCU implementation; it is -not- an exported member of the RCU API.
*/
int rcu_pending(int cpu)
{
return __rcu_pending(&rcu_state, &per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu)) ||
__rcu_pending(&rcu_bh_state, &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu));
}
/*
* Check to see if any future RCU-related work will need to be done
* by the current CPU, even if none need be done immediately, returning
* 1 if so. This function is part of the RCU implementation; it is -not-
* an exported member of the RCU API.
*/
int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
{
/* RCU callbacks either ready or pending? */
return per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu).nxtlist ||
per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu).nxtlist;
}
/*
* Initialize a CPU's per-CPU RCU data. We take this "scorched earth"
* approach so that we don't have to worry about how long the CPU has
* been gone, or whether it ever was online previously. We do trust the
* ->mynode field, as it is constant for a given struct rcu_data and
* initialized during early boot.
*
* Note that only one online or offline event can be happening at a given
* time. Note also that we can accept some slop in the rsp->completed
* access due to the fact that this CPU cannot possibly have any RCU
* callbacks in flight yet.
*/
static void __cpuinit
"Tree RCU": scalable classic RCU implementation This patch fixes a long-standing performance bug in classic RCU that results in massive internal-to-RCU lock contention on systems with more than a few hundred CPUs. Although this patch creates a separate flavor of RCU for ease of review and patch maintenance, it is intended to replace classic RCU. This patch still handles stress better than does mainline, so I am still calling it ready for inclusion. This patch is against the -tip tree. Nevertheless, experience on an actual 1000+ CPU machine would still be most welcome. Most of the changes noted below were found while creating an rcutiny (which should permit ejecting the current rcuclassic) and while doing detailed line-by-line documentation. Updates from v9 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/2/334): o Fixes from remainder of line-by-line code walkthrough, including comment spelling, initialization, undesirable narrowing due to type conversion, removing redundant memory barriers, removing redundant local-variable initialization, and removing redundant local variables. I do not believe that any of these fixes address the CPU-hotplug issues that Andi Kleen was seeing, but please do give it a whirl in case the machine is smarter than I am. A writeup from the walkthrough may be found at the following URL, in case you are suffering from terminal insomnia or masochism: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/paulmck/tmp/rcutree-walkthrough.2008.12.16a.pdf o Made rcutree tracing use seq_file, as suggested some time ago by Lai Jiangshan. o Added a .csv variant of the rcudata debugfs trace file, to allow people having thousands of CPUs to drop the data into a spreadsheet. Tested with oocalc and gnumeric. Updated documentation to suit. Updates from v8 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/15/139): o Fix a theoretical race between grace-period initialization and force_quiescent_state() that could occur if more than three jiffies were required to carry out the grace-period initialization. Which it might, if you had enough CPUs. o Apply Ingo's printk-standardization patch. o Substitute local variables for repeated accesses to global variables. o Fix comment misspellings and redundant (but harmless) increments of ->n_rcu_pending (this latter after having explicitly added it). o Apply checkpatch fixes. Updates from v7 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/10/291): o Fixed a number of problems noted by Gautham Shenoy, including the cpu-stall-detection bug that he was having difficulty convincing me was real. ;-) o Changed cpu-stall detection to wait for ten seconds rather than three in order to reduce false positive, as suggested by Ingo Molnar. o Produced a design document (http://lwn.net/Articles/305782/). The act of writing this document uncovered a number of both theoretical and "here and now" bugs as noted below. o Fix dynticks_nesting accounting confusion, simplify WARN_ON() condition, fix kerneldoc comments, and add memory barriers in dynticks interface functions. o Add more data to tracing. o Remove unused "rcu_barrier" field from rcu_data structure. o Count calls to rcu_pending() from scheduling-clock interrupt to use as a surrogate timebase should jiffies stop counting. o Fix a theoretical race between force_quiescent_state() and grace-period initialization. Yes, initialization does have to go on for some jiffies for this race to occur, but given enough CPUs... Updates from v6 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/23/448): o Fix a number of checkpatch.pl complaints. o Apply review comments from Ingo Molnar and Lai Jiangshan on the stall-detection code. o Fix several bugs in !CONFIG_SMP builds. o Fix a misspelled config-parameter name so that RCU now announces at boot time if stall detection is configured. o Run tests on numerous combinations of configurations parameters, which after the fixes above, now build and run correctly. Updates from v5 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/15/92, bad subject line): o Fix a compiler error in the !CONFIG_FANOUT_EXACT case (blew a changeset some time ago, and finally got around to retesting this option). o Fix some tracing bugs in rcupreempt that caused incorrect totals to be printed. o I now test with a more brutal random-selection online/offline script (attached). Probably more brutal than it needs to be on the people reading it as well, but so it goes. o A number of optimizations and usability improvements: o Make rcu_pending() ignore the grace-period timeout when there is no grace period in progress. o Make force_quiescent_state() avoid going for a global lock in the case where there is no grace period in progress. o Rearrange struct fields to improve struct layout. o Make call_rcu() initiate a grace period if RCU was idle, rather than waiting for the next scheduling clock interrupt. o Invoke rcu_irq_enter() and rcu_irq_exit() only when idle, as suggested by Andi Kleen. I still don't completely trust this change, and might back it out. o Make CONFIG_RCU_TRACE be the single config variable manipulated for all forms of RCU, instead of the prior confusion. o Document tracing files and formats for both rcupreempt and rcutree. Updates from v4 for those missing v5 given its bad subject line: o Separated dynticks interface so that NMIs and irqs call separate functions, greatly simplifying it. In particular, this code no longer requires a proof of correctness. ;-) o Separated dynticks state out into its own per-CPU structure, avoiding the duplicated accounting. o The case where a dynticks-idle CPU runs an irq handler that invokes call_rcu() is now correctly handled, forcing that CPU out of dynticks-idle mode. o Review comments have been applied (thank you all!!!). For but one example, fixed the dynticks-ordering issue that Manfred pointed out, saving me much debugging. ;-) o Adjusted rcuclassic and rcupreempt to handle dynticks changes. Attached is an updated patch to Classic RCU that applies a hierarchy, greatly reducing the contention on the top-level lock for large machines. This passes 10-hour concurrent rcutorture and online-offline testing on 128-CPU ppc64 without dynticks enabled, and exposes some timekeeping bugs in presence of dynticks (exciting working on a system where "sleep 1" hangs until interrupted...), which were fixed in the 2.6.27 kernel. It is getting more reliable than mainline by some measures, so the next version will be against -tip for inclusion. See also Manfred Spraul's recent patches (or his earlier work from 2004 at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=108546384711797&w=2). We will converge onto a common patch in the fullness of time, but are currently exploring different regions of the design space. That said, I have already gratefully stolen quite a few of Manfred's ideas. This patch provides CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, which controls the bushiness of the RCU hierarchy. Defaults to 32 on 32-bit machines and 64 on 64-bit machines. If CONFIG_NR_CPUS is less than CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, there is no hierarchy. By default, the RCU initialization code will adjust CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT to balance the hierarchy, so strongly NUMA architectures may choose to set CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT to disable this balancing, allowing the hierarchy to be exactly aligned to the underlying hardware. Up to two levels of hierarchy are permitted (in addition to the root node), allowing up to 16,384 CPUs on 32-bit systems and up to 262,144 CPUs on 64-bit systems. I just know that I am going to regret saying this, but this seems more than sufficient for the foreseeable future. (Some architectures might wish to set CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=4, which would limit such architectures to 64 CPUs. If this becomes a real problem, additional levels can be added, but I doubt that it will make a significant difference on real hardware.) In the common case, a given CPU will manipulate its private rcu_data structure and the rcu_node structure that it shares with its immediate neighbors. This can reduce both lock and memory contention by multiple orders of magnitude, which should eliminate the need for the strange manipulations that are reported to be required when running Linux on very large systems. Some shortcomings: o More bugs will probably surface as a result of an ongoing line-by-line code inspection. Patches will be provided as required. o There are probably hangs, rcutorture failures, &c. Seems quite stable on a 128-CPU machine, but that is kind of small compared to 4096 CPUs. However, seems to do better than mainline. Patches will be provided as required. o The memory footprint of this version is several KB larger than rcuclassic. A separate UP-only rcutiny patch will be provided, which will reduce the memory footprint significantly, even compared to the old rcuclassic. One such patch passes light testing, and has a memory footprint smaller even than rcuclassic. Initial reaction from various embedded guys was "it is not worth it", so am putting it aside. Credits: o Manfred Spraul for ideas, review comments, and bugs spotted, as well as some good friendly competition. ;-) o Josh Triplett, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan, Andi Kleen, Andy Whitcroft, and Andrew Morton for reviews and comments. o Thomas Gleixner for much-needed help with some timer issues (see patches below). o Jon M. Tollefson, Tim Pepper, Andrew Theurer, Jose R. Santos, Andy Whitcroft, Darrick Wong, Nishanth Aravamudan, Anton Blanchard, Dave Kleikamp, and Nathan Lynch for keeping machines alive despite my heavy abuse^Wtesting. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-12-19 04:55:32 +08:00
rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
unsigned long flags;
int i;
long lastcomp;
unsigned long mask;
struct rcu_data *rdp = rsp->rda[cpu];
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
/* Set up local state, ensuring consistent view of global state. */
spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
lastcomp = rsp->completed;
rdp->completed = lastcomp;
rdp->gpnum = lastcomp;
rdp->passed_quiesc = 0; /* We could be racing with new GP, */
rdp->qs_pending = 1; /* so set up to respond to current GP. */
rdp->beenonline = 1; /* We have now been online. */
rdp->passed_quiesc_completed = lastcomp - 1;
rdp->grpmask = 1UL << (cpu - rdp->mynode->grplo);
rdp->nxtlist = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < RCU_NEXT_SIZE; i++)
rdp->nxttail[i] = &rdp->nxtlist;
rdp->qlen = 0;
rdp->blimit = blimit;
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
rdp->dynticks = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ */
rdp->cpu = cpu;
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
/*
* A new grace period might start here. If so, we won't be part
* of it, but that is OK, as we are currently in a quiescent state.
*/
/* Exclude any attempts to start a new GP on large systems. */
spin_lock(&rsp->onofflock); /* irqs already disabled. */
/* Add CPU to rcu_node bitmasks. */
rnp = rdp->mynode;
mask = rdp->grpmask;
do {
/* Exclude any attempts to start a new GP on small systems. */
spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
rnp->qsmaskinit |= mask;
mask = rnp->grpmask;
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
rnp = rnp->parent;
} while (rnp != NULL && !(rnp->qsmaskinit & mask));
spin_unlock(&rsp->onofflock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
/*
* A new grace period might start here. If so, we will be part of
* it, and its gpnum will be greater than ours, so we will
* participate. It is also possible for the gpnum to have been
* incremented before this function was called, and the bitmasks
* to not be filled out until now, in which case we will also
* participate due to our gpnum being behind.
*/
/* Since it is coming online, the CPU is in a quiescent state. */
cpu_quiet(cpu, rsp, rdp, lastcomp);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
static void __cpuinit rcu_online_cpu(int cpu)
{
rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_state);
rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_bh_state);
open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks);
}
/*
* Handle CPU online/offline notifcation events.
*/
static int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
long cpu = (long)hcpu;
switch (action) {
case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
case CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN:
rcu_online_cpu(cpu);
break;
case CPU_DEAD:
case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
rcu_offline_cpu(cpu);
break;
default:
break;
}
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
/*
* Compute the per-level fanout, either using the exact fanout specified
* or balancing the tree, depending on CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT
static void __init rcu_init_levelspread(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
int i;
for (i = NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1; i >= 0; i--)
rsp->levelspread[i] = CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT;
}
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT */
static void __init rcu_init_levelspread(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
int ccur;
int cprv;
int i;
cprv = NR_CPUS;
for (i = NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
ccur = rsp->levelcnt[i];
rsp->levelspread[i] = (cprv + ccur - 1) / ccur;
cprv = ccur;
}
}
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT */
/*
* Helper function for rcu_init() that initializes one rcu_state structure.
*/
static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
int cpustride = 1;
int i;
int j;
struct rcu_node *rnp;
/* Initialize the level-tracking arrays. */
for (i = 1; i < NUM_RCU_LVLS; i++)
rsp->level[i] = rsp->level[i - 1] + rsp->levelcnt[i - 1];
rcu_init_levelspread(rsp);
/* Initialize the elements themselves, starting from the leaves. */
for (i = NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
cpustride *= rsp->levelspread[i];
rnp = rsp->level[i];
for (j = 0; j < rsp->levelcnt[i]; j++, rnp++) {
spin_lock_init(&rnp->lock);
rnp->qsmask = 0;
rnp->qsmaskinit = 0;
rnp->grplo = j * cpustride;
rnp->grphi = (j + 1) * cpustride - 1;
if (rnp->grphi >= NR_CPUS)
rnp->grphi = NR_CPUS - 1;
if (i == 0) {
rnp->grpnum = 0;
rnp->grpmask = 0;
rnp->parent = NULL;
} else {
rnp->grpnum = j % rsp->levelspread[i - 1];
rnp->grpmask = 1UL << rnp->grpnum;
rnp->parent = rsp->level[i - 1] +
j / rsp->levelspread[i - 1];
}
rnp->level = i;
}
}
}
/*
* Helper macro for __rcu_init(). To be used nowhere else!
* Assigns leaf node pointers into each CPU's rcu_data structure.
*/
#define RCU_DATA_PTR_INIT(rsp, rcu_data) \
do { \
rnp = (rsp)->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1]; \
j = 0; \
for_each_possible_cpu(i) { \
if (i > rnp[j].grphi) \
j++; \
per_cpu(rcu_data, i).mynode = &rnp[j]; \
(rsp)->rda[i] = &per_cpu(rcu_data, i); \
} \
} while (0)
static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata rcu_nb = {
.notifier_call = rcu_cpu_notify,
};
void __init __rcu_init(void)
{
int i; /* All used by RCU_DATA_PTR_INIT(). */
int j;
struct rcu_node *rnp;
printk(KERN_WARNING "Experimental hierarchical RCU implementation.\n");
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR
printk(KERN_INFO "RCU-based detection of stalled CPUs is enabled.\n");
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR */
rcu_init_one(&rcu_state);
RCU_DATA_PTR_INIT(&rcu_state, rcu_data);
rcu_init_one(&rcu_bh_state);
RCU_DATA_PTR_INIT(&rcu_bh_state, rcu_bh_data);
for_each_online_cpu(i)
rcu_cpu_notify(&rcu_nb, CPU_UP_PREPARE, (void *)(long)i);
/* Register notifier for non-boot CPUs */
register_cpu_notifier(&rcu_nb);
printk(KERN_WARNING "Experimental hierarchical RCU init done.\n");
}
module_param(blimit, int, 0);
module_param(qhimark, int, 0);
module_param(qlowmark, int, 0);