mm, swap: improve readability via make spin_lock/unlock balanced
This is just a cleanup patch, no functionality change. In cluster_list_add_tail(), spin_lock_nested() is used to lock the cluster, while unlock_cluster() is used to unlock the cluster. To improve the code readability, use spin_unlock() directly to unlock the cluster. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170317064635.12792-2-ying.huang@intel.com Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Acked-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9c1cc2e4f2
commit
0ef017d117
|
@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ static void cluster_list_add_tail(struct swap_cluster_list *list,
|
|||
ci_tail = ci + tail;
|
||||
spin_lock_nested(&ci_tail->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
|
||||
cluster_set_next(ci_tail, idx);
|
||||
unlock_cluster(ci_tail);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&ci_tail->lock);
|
||||
cluster_set_next_flag(&list->tail, idx, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user