nfs: lock() vs unlock() typo
These should be spin_unlock() instead of spin_lock(). It's a typo. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a872d51010
commit
1c34092adf
|
@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ char *nfs_path(char **p, struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, ssize_t buflen)
|
|||
namelen--;
|
||||
buflen -= namelen;
|
||||
if (buflen < 0) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
goto Elong;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ char *nfs_path(char **p, struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, ssize_t buflen)
|
|||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
return end;
|
||||
Elong_unlock:
|
||||
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
if (read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
|
||||
goto rename_retry;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user