drm/i915/dsi: Fix swapping of MIPI_SEQ_DEASSERT_RESET / MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET
Looking at the ADF code from the Android kernel sources for a cherrytrail tablet I noticed that it is calling the MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET sequence from the panel prepare hook. Until commitb1cb1bd291
("drm/i915/dsi: update reset and power sequences in panel prepare/unprepare hooks") the mainline i915 code was doing the same. That commits effectively swaps the calling of MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET / MIPI_SEQ_DEASSERT_RESET. Looking at the naming of the sequences that is the right thing to do, but the problem is, that the old mainline code and the ADF code was actually calling the right sequence (tested on a cube iwork8 air tablet), and the swapping of the calling breaks things. This breakage was likely not noticed in testing because on cherrytrail, currently chv_exec_gpio ends up disabling the gpio pins rather then setting them (this is fixed in the next patch in this patch-set). This commit fixes the swapping by fixing MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT/DEASSERT_RESET's places in the enum defining them, so that their (new) names match their actual use. Changes in v2: -Add a comment to the enum explaining that the assert/reassert names are swapped in the spec Fixes:b1cb1bd291
("drm/i915/dsi: update reset and power sequences...") Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161202150128.29871-1-hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (cherry picked from commit2b8208ac93
) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bb98e72ada
commit
25e23bc57e
|
@ -46,14 +46,20 @@ struct edp_power_seq {
|
|||
u16 t11_t12;
|
||||
} __packed;
|
||||
|
||||
/* MIPI Sequence Block definitions */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* MIPI Sequence Block definitions
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note the VBT spec has AssertReset / DeassertReset swapped from their
|
||||
* usual naming, we use the proper names here to avoid confusion when
|
||||
* reading the code.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
enum mipi_seq {
|
||||
MIPI_SEQ_END = 0,
|
||||
MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET,
|
||||
MIPI_SEQ_DEASSERT_RESET, /* Spec says MipiAssertResetPin */
|
||||
MIPI_SEQ_INIT_OTP,
|
||||
MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_ON,
|
||||
MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF,
|
||||
MIPI_SEQ_DEASSERT_RESET,
|
||||
MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET, /* Spec says MipiDeassertResetPin */
|
||||
MIPI_SEQ_BACKLIGHT_ON, /* sequence block v2+ */
|
||||
MIPI_SEQ_BACKLIGHT_OFF, /* sequence block v2+ */
|
||||
MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_ON, /* sequence block v2+ */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -376,11 +376,11 @@ static const fn_mipi_elem_exec exec_elem[] = {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
static const char * const seq_name[] = {
|
||||
[MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET] = "MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET",
|
||||
[MIPI_SEQ_DEASSERT_RESET] = "MIPI_SEQ_DEASSERT_RESET",
|
||||
[MIPI_SEQ_INIT_OTP] = "MIPI_SEQ_INIT_OTP",
|
||||
[MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_ON] = "MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_ON",
|
||||
[MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF] = "MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF",
|
||||
[MIPI_SEQ_DEASSERT_RESET] = "MIPI_SEQ_DEASSERT_RESET",
|
||||
[MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET] = "MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET",
|
||||
[MIPI_SEQ_BACKLIGHT_ON] = "MIPI_SEQ_BACKLIGHT_ON",
|
||||
[MIPI_SEQ_BACKLIGHT_OFF] = "MIPI_SEQ_BACKLIGHT_OFF",
|
||||
[MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_ON] = "MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_ON",
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user