rxrpc: Fix set but unused variable 'usage' in rxrpc_get_peer().
I backed off from trying to just eliminate this variable, since transforming atomic_inc_return() into atomic_inc() takes away the memory barriers. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c9d10c497c
commit
2a64255019
|
@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_get_peer(struct sockaddr_rxrpc *srx, gfp_t gfp)
|
|||
/* we can now add the new candidate to the list */
|
||||
peer = candidate;
|
||||
candidate = NULL;
|
||||
usage = atomic_read(&peer->usage);
|
||||
|
||||
list_add_tail(&peer->link, &rxrpc_peers);
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&rxrpc_peer_lock);
|
||||
|
@ -171,7 +172,7 @@ struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_get_peer(struct sockaddr_rxrpc *srx, gfp_t gfp)
|
|||
&peer->srx.transport.sin.sin_addr,
|
||||
ntohs(peer->srx.transport.sin.sin_port));
|
||||
|
||||
_leave(" = %p {u=%d}", peer, atomic_read(&peer->usage));
|
||||
_leave(" = %p {u=%d}", peer, usage);
|
||||
return peer;
|
||||
|
||||
/* we found the peer in the list immediately */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user