rxrpc: use rcu protection while reading sk->sk_user_data
We need to extend the rcu_read_lock() section in rxrpc_error_report() and use rcu_dereference_sk_user_data() instead of plain access to sk->sk_user_data to make sure all rules are respected. The compiler wont reload sk->sk_user_data at will, and RCU rules prevent memory beeing freed too soon. Fixes:f0308fb070
("rxrpc: Fix possible NULL pointer access in ICMP handling") Fixes:17926a7932
("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bd74708cd9
commit
2ca4f6ca45
|
@ -147,13 +147,16 @@ void rxrpc_error_report(struct sock *sk)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct sock_exterr_skb *serr;
|
||||
struct sockaddr_rxrpc srx;
|
||||
struct rxrpc_local *local = sk->sk_user_data;
|
||||
struct rxrpc_local *local;
|
||||
struct rxrpc_peer *peer;
|
||||
struct sk_buff *skb;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(!local))
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
local = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sk);
|
||||
if (unlikely(!local)) {
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
_enter("%p{%d}", sk, local->debug_id);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Clear the outstanding error value on the socket so that it doesn't
|
||||
|
@ -163,6 +166,7 @@ void rxrpc_error_report(struct sock *sk)
|
|||
|
||||
skb = sock_dequeue_err_skb(sk);
|
||||
if (!skb) {
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
_leave("UDP socket errqueue empty");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -170,11 +174,11 @@ void rxrpc_error_report(struct sock *sk)
|
|||
serr = SKB_EXT_ERR(skb);
|
||||
if (!skb->len && serr->ee.ee_origin == SO_EE_ORIGIN_TIMESTAMPING) {
|
||||
_leave("UDP empty message");
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
rxrpc_free_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_freed);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
peer = rxrpc_lookup_peer_icmp_rcu(local, skb, &srx);
|
||||
if (peer && !rxrpc_get_peer_maybe(peer))
|
||||
peer = NULL;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user