[PATCH] make local_t signed
local_t's were defined to be unsigned. This increases confusion because atomic_t's are signed. The patch goes through and changes all implementations to use signed longs throughout. Also, x86-64 was using 32-bit quantities for the value passed into local_add() and local_sub(). Fixed. All (actually, both) existing users have been audited. (Also s/__inline__/inline/ in x86_64/local.h) Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
09ce3512dc
commit
2cf8d82d63
|
@ -7,8 +7,15 @@
|
|||
#include <asm/atomic.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/types.h>
|
||||
|
||||
/* An unsigned long type for operations which are atomic for a single
|
||||
* CPU. Usually used in combination with per-cpu variables. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* A signed long type for operations which are atomic for a single CPU.
|
||||
* Usually used in combination with per-cpu variables.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is the default implementation, which uses atomic_long_t. Which is
|
||||
* rather pointless. The whole point behind local_t is that some processors
|
||||
* can perform atomic adds and subtracts in a manner which is atomic wrt IRQs
|
||||
* running on this CPU. local_t allows exploitation of such capabilities.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/* Implement in terms of atomics. */
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -20,7 +27,7 @@ typedef struct
|
|||
|
||||
#define LOCAL_INIT(i) { ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(i) }
|
||||
|
||||
#define local_read(l) ((unsigned long)atomic_long_read(&(l)->a))
|
||||
#define local_read(l) atomic_long_read(&(l)->a)
|
||||
#define local_set(l,i) atomic_long_set((&(l)->a),(i))
|
||||
#define local_inc(l) atomic_long_inc(&(l)->a)
|
||||
#define local_dec(l) atomic_long_dec(&(l)->a)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
typedef struct
|
||||
{
|
||||
volatile unsigned long counter;
|
||||
volatile long counter;
|
||||
} local_t;
|
||||
|
||||
#define LOCAL_INIT(i) { (i) }
|
||||
|
@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static __inline__ void local_dec(local_t *v)
|
|||
:"m" (v->counter));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __inline__ void local_add(unsigned long i, local_t *v)
|
||||
static __inline__ void local_add(long i, local_t *v)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
||||
"addl %1,%0"
|
||||
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static __inline__ void local_add(unsigned long i, local_t *v)
|
|||
:"ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __inline__ void local_sub(unsigned long i, local_t *v)
|
||||
static __inline__ void local_sub(long i, local_t *v)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
||||
"subl %1,%0"
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
typedef struct
|
||||
{
|
||||
volatile unsigned long counter;
|
||||
volatile long counter;
|
||||
} local_t;
|
||||
|
||||
#define LOCAL_INIT(i) { (i) }
|
||||
|
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ typedef struct
|
|||
#define local_read(v) ((v)->counter)
|
||||
#define local_set(v,i) (((v)->counter) = (i))
|
||||
|
||||
static __inline__ void local_inc(local_t *v)
|
||||
static inline void local_inc(local_t *v)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
||||
"incq %0"
|
||||
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static __inline__ void local_inc(local_t *v)
|
|||
:"m" (v->counter));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __inline__ void local_dec(local_t *v)
|
||||
static inline void local_dec(local_t *v)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
||||
"decq %0"
|
||||
|
@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static __inline__ void local_dec(local_t *v)
|
|||
:"m" (v->counter));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __inline__ void local_add(unsigned int i, local_t *v)
|
||||
static inline void local_add(long i, local_t *v)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
||||
"addq %1,%0"
|
||||
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static __inline__ void local_add(unsigned int i, local_t *v)
|
|||
:"ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __inline__ void local_sub(unsigned int i, local_t *v)
|
||||
static inline void local_sub(long i, local_t *v)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
||||
"subq %1,%0"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user