ALSA: seq: Don't handle loop timeout at snd_seq_pool_done()
snd_seq_pool_done() syncs with closing of all opened threads, but it aborts the wait loop with a timeout, and proceeds to the release resource even if not all threads have been closed. The timeout was 5 seconds, and if you run a crazy stuff, it can exceed easily, and may result in the access of the invalid memory address -- this is what syzkaller detected in a bug report. As a fix, let the code graduate from naiveness, simply remove the loop timeout. BugLink: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+YdhDV2H5LLzDTJDVF-qiYHUHhtRaW4rbb4gUhTCQB81w@mail.gmail.com Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d5adbfcd5f
commit
37a7ea4a9b
|
@ -419,7 +419,6 @@ int snd_seq_pool_done(struct snd_seq_pool *pool)
|
|||
{
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
struct snd_seq_event_cell *ptr;
|
||||
int max_count = 5 * HZ;
|
||||
|
||||
if (snd_BUG_ON(!pool))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
@ -432,14 +431,8 @@ int snd_seq_pool_done(struct snd_seq_pool *pool)
|
|||
if (waitqueue_active(&pool->output_sleep))
|
||||
wake_up(&pool->output_sleep);
|
||||
|
||||
while (atomic_read(&pool->counter) > 0) {
|
||||
if (max_count == 0) {
|
||||
pr_warn("ALSA: snd_seq_pool_done timeout: %d cells remain\n", atomic_read(&pool->counter));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
while (atomic_read(&pool->counter) > 0)
|
||||
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
|
||||
max_count--;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* release all resources */
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->lock, flags);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user