mm,compaction: serialize waitqueue_active() checks
Without a memory barrier, the following race can occur with a high-order allocation: wakeup_kcompactd(order == 1) kcompactd() [L] waitqueue_active(kcompactd_wait) [S] prepare_to_wait_event(kcompactd_wait) [L] (kcompactd_max_order == 0) [S] kcompactd_max_order = order; schedule() Where the waitqueue_active() check is speculatively re-ordered to before setting the actual condition (max_order), not seeing the threads that's going to block; making us miss a wakeup. There are a couple of options to fix this, including calling wq_has_sleepers() which adds a full barrier, or unconditionally doing the wake_up_interruptible() and serialize on the q->lock. However, to make use of the control dependency, we just need to add L->L guarantees. While this bug is theoretical, there have been other offenders of the lockless waitqueue_active() in the past -- this is also documented in the call itself. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1483975528-24342-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b92df1de5d
commit
46acef048a
|
@ -1966,6 +1966,13 @@ void wakeup_kcompactd(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
|
|||
if (pgdat->kcompactd_max_order < order)
|
||||
pgdat->kcompactd_max_order = order;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Pairs with implicit barrier in wait_event_freezable()
|
||||
* such that wakeups are not missed in the lockless
|
||||
* waitqueue_active() call.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
|
||||
|
||||
if (pgdat->kcompactd_classzone_idx > classzone_idx)
|
||||
pgdat->kcompactd_classzone_idx = classzone_idx;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user