tick-common: Fix wrong check in tick_check_replacement()
tick_check_replacement() returns if a replacement of clock_event_device is possible or not. It does this as the first check: if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id())) return false; Thats wrong. tick_check_percpu() returns true when the device is useable. Check for false instead. [ tglx: Massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.11+ Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com Cc: Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com Cc: linaro-networking@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/486a02efe0246635aaba786e24b42d316438bf3b.1397537987.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
55101e2d6c
commit
521c42990e
@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
|
||||
bool tick_check_replacement(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
|
||||
struct clock_event_device *newdev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
|
||||
if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
return tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user