[CRYPTO] padlock-sha: TFMs don't need to be static
TFMs are local variables. No need to declare them static. After all one is enough. Signed-off-by: Michal Ludvig <michal@logix.cz> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5644bda5d6
commit
58ec415289
@ -262,28 +262,28 @@ static struct crypto_alg sha256_alg = {
|
||||
|
||||
static void __init padlock_sha_check_fallbacks(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static struct crypto_tfm *tfm_sha1, *tfm_sha256;
|
||||
struct crypto_tfm *tfm;
|
||||
|
||||
/* We'll try to allocate one TFM for each fallback
|
||||
* to test that the modules are available. */
|
||||
tfm_sha1 = crypto_alloc_tfm(sha1_fallback, 0);
|
||||
if (!tfm_sha1) {
|
||||
tfm = crypto_alloc_tfm(sha1_fallback, 0);
|
||||
if (!tfm) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_WARNING PFX "Couldn't load fallback module for '%s'. Tried '%s'.\n",
|
||||
sha1_alg.cra_name, sha1_fallback);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "Fallback for '%s' is driver '%s' (prio=%d)\n", sha1_alg.cra_name,
|
||||
crypto_tfm_alg_driver_name(tfm_sha1), crypto_tfm_alg_priority(tfm_sha1));
|
||||
crypto_free_tfm(tfm_sha1);
|
||||
crypto_tfm_alg_driver_name(tfm), crypto_tfm_alg_priority(tfm));
|
||||
crypto_free_tfm(tfm);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tfm_sha256 = crypto_alloc_tfm(sha256_fallback, 0);
|
||||
if (!tfm_sha256) {
|
||||
tfm = crypto_alloc_tfm(sha256_fallback, 0);
|
||||
if (!tfm) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_WARNING PFX "Couldn't load fallback module for '%s'. Tried '%s'.\n",
|
||||
sha256_alg.cra_name, sha256_fallback);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "Fallback for '%s' is driver '%s' (prio=%d)\n", sha256_alg.cra_name,
|
||||
crypto_tfm_alg_driver_name(tfm_sha256), crypto_tfm_alg_priority(tfm_sha256));
|
||||
crypto_free_tfm(tfm_sha256);
|
||||
crypto_tfm_alg_driver_name(tfm), crypto_tfm_alg_priority(tfm));
|
||||
crypto_free_tfm(tfm);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user