luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

e1000e: avoid duplicated output of device name in kernel warning

Browse Source 
With 2.6.27-rc3 I noticed the following messages in my boot log:

0000:01:00.0: 0000:01:00.0: Warning: detected DSPD enabled in EEPROM
0000:01:00.0: eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x1) 00:16:76:04:ff:09

The second seems correct, but the first has a silly repetition of the
PCI device before the actual message. The message originates from
e1000_eeprom_checks in e1000e/netdev.c.

With this patch below the first message becomes

  e1000e 0000:01:00.0: Warning: detected DSPD enabled in EEPROM

which makes it similar to directly preceding messages.

Use dev_warn instead of e_warn in e1000_eeprom_checks() as the interface
name has not yet been assigned at that point.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Frans Pop 2008-09-22 14:52:22 -07:00 committed by Jeff Garzik
parent a4e77d063d
commit 6c2a9efade
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
View File

@ -4671,13 +4671,15 @@ static void e1000_eeprom_checks(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
ret_val = e1000_read_nvm(hw, NVM_INIT_CONTROL2_REG, 1, &buf);
if (!(le16_to_cpu(buf) & (1 << 0))) {
/* Deep Smart Power Down (DSPD) */
e_warn("Warning: detected DSPD enabled in EEPROM\n");
dev_warn(&adapter->pdev->dev,
"Warning: detected DSPD enabled in EEPROM\n");
}
ret_val = e1000_read_nvm(hw, NVM_INIT_3GIO_3, 1, &buf);
if (le16_to_cpu(buf) & (3 << 2)) {
/* ASPM enable */
e_warn("Warning: detected ASPM enabled in EEPROM\n");
dev_warn(&adapter->pdev->dev,
"Warning: detected ASPM enabled in EEPROM\n");
}
}