C6X: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
As described ine6fa16ab9c
("signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is pending in the shared queue. Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked") which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so using this helper function should stop that from happening again. Acked-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
389325b449
commit
6e61ee3b7a
|
@ -85,10 +85,7 @@ asmlinkage int do_rt_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
|||
goto badframe;
|
||||
|
||||
sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
current->blocked = set;
|
||||
recalc_sigpending();
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
set_current_blocked(&set);
|
||||
|
||||
if (restore_sigcontext(regs, &frame->uc.uc_mcontext))
|
||||
goto badframe;
|
||||
|
@ -279,15 +276,8 @@ static int handle_signal(int sig,
|
|||
|
||||
/* Set up the stack frame */
|
||||
ret = setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs);
|
||||
if (ret == 0) {
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
sigorsets(¤t->blocked, ¤t->blocked,
|
||||
&ka->sa.sa_mask);
|
||||
if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
|
||||
sigaddset(¤t->blocked, sig);
|
||||
recalc_sigpending();
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ret == 0)
|
||||
block_sigmask(ka, sig);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user