x86: add e820_remove_range
... so could add real hole in e820 agp check is using request_mem_region, and could fail if e820 is reserved... Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9a25034759
commit
7a1fd9866c
@ -429,6 +429,41 @@ u64 __init e820_update_range(u64 start, u64 size, unsigned old_type,
|
||||
return real_updated_size;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* make e820 not cover the range */
|
||||
u64 __init e820_remove_range(u64 start, u64 size, unsigned old_type,
|
||||
int checktype)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
u64 real_removed_size = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < e820.nr_map; i++) {
|
||||
struct e820entry *ei = &e820.map[i];
|
||||
u64 final_start, final_end;
|
||||
|
||||
if (checktype && ei->type != old_type)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
/* totally covered? */
|
||||
if (ei->addr >= start &&
|
||||
(ei->addr + ei->size) <= (start + size)) {
|
||||
real_removed_size += ei->size;
|
||||
memset(ei, 0, sizeof(struct e820entry));
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* partially covered */
|
||||
final_start = max(start, ei->addr);
|
||||
final_end = min(start + size, ei->addr + ei->size);
|
||||
if (final_start >= final_end)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
real_removed_size += final_end - final_start;
|
||||
|
||||
ei->size -= final_end - final_start;
|
||||
if (ei->addr < final_start)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
ei->addr = final_end;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return real_removed_size;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void __init update_e820(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int nr_map;
|
||||
|
@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ sanitize_e820_map(struct e820entry *biosmap, int max_nr_map, int *pnr_map);
|
||||
extern int copy_e820_map(struct e820entry *biosmap, int nr_map);
|
||||
extern u64 e820_update_range(u64 start, u64 size, unsigned old_type,
|
||||
unsigned new_type);
|
||||
extern u64 e820_remove_range(u64 start, u64 size, unsigned old_type,
|
||||
int checktype);
|
||||
extern void update_e820(void);
|
||||
extern void e820_setup_gap(void);
|
||||
struct setup_data;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user