luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

UBIFS: fix typos in comments

Browse Source 
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
This commit is contained in:
Adrian Hunter 2008-07-23 15:48:39 +03:00 committed by Artem Bityutskiy
parent bc813355c7
commit 7d62ff2c39
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
fs/ubifs/journal.c
View File

@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ int ubifs_jnl_write_inode(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct inode *inode)
}
/**
* ubifs_jnl_write_inode - delete an inode.
* ubifs_jnl_delete_inode - delete an inode.
* @c: UBIFS file-system description object
* @inode: inode to delete
*
@ -831,21 +831,21 @@ int ubifs_jnl_write_inode(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct inode *inode)
* journal.
*
* When regular file inodes are unlinked or a directory inode is removed, the
* 'ubifs_jnl_update()' function write corresponding deletion inode and
* 'ubifs_jnl_update()' function writes a corresponding deletion inode and
* direntry to the media, and adds the inode to orphans. After this, when the
* last reference to this inode has been dropped, this function is called. In
* general, it has to write one more deletion inode to the media, because if
* a commit happened between 'ubifs_jnl_update()' and
* 'ubifs_jnl_delete_inode()', the deletion inode is not in the journal
* anymore, and in fact it might be not on the flash anymore, becouse it might
* have been garbage-collected already. And for optimization reasond UBIFS does
* anymore, and in fact it might not be on the flash anymore, because it might
* have been garbage-collected already. And for optimization reasons UBIFS does
* not read the orphan area if it has been unmounted cleanly, so it would have
* no indication in the journal that there is a deleted inode which has to be
* removed from TNC.
*
* However, if there was no commit between 'ubifs_jnl_update()' and
* 'ubifs_jnl_delete_inode()', then there is no need to write the deletion
* inode to the media for the second time. And this is quite typical case.
* inode to the media for the second time. And this is quite a typical case.
*
* This function returns zero in case of success and a negative error code in
* case of failure.