s390/extable: fix exception table sorting
commit c194dad21025dfd043210912653baab823bdff67 upstream.
s390 has a swap_ex_entry_fixup function, however it is not being used
since common code expects a swap_ex_entry_fixup define. If it is not
defined the default implementation will be used. So fix this by adding
a proper define.
However also the implementation of the function must be fixed, since a
NULL value for handler has a special meaning and must not be adjusted.
Luckily all of this doesn't fix a real bug currently: the main extable
is correctly sorted during build time, and for runtime sorting there
is currently no case where the handler field is not NULL.
Fixes: 05a68e892e
("s390/kernel: expand exception table logic to allow new handling options")
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
49aa9c9c7f
commit
8b20c1999d
|
@ -69,8 +69,13 @@ static inline void swap_ex_entry_fixup(struct exception_table_entry *a,
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
a->fixup = b->fixup + delta;
|
a->fixup = b->fixup + delta;
|
||||||
b->fixup = tmp.fixup - delta;
|
b->fixup = tmp.fixup - delta;
|
||||||
a->handler = b->handler + delta;
|
a->handler = b->handler;
|
||||||
b->handler = tmp.handler - delta;
|
if (a->handler)
|
||||||
|
a->handler += delta;
|
||||||
|
b->handler = tmp.handler;
|
||||||
|
if (b->handler)
|
||||||
|
b->handler -= delta;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
#define swap_ex_entry_fixup swap_ex_entry_fixup
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user