[PATCH] sched_setscheduler: fix? policy checks
I am not sure this patch is correct: I can't understand what the current code does, and I don't know what it was supposed to do. The comment says: * can't change policy, except between SCHED_NORMAL * and SCHED_BATCH: The code: if (((policy != SCHED_NORMAL && p->policy != SCHED_BATCH) && (policy != SCHED_BATCH && p->policy != SCHED_NORMAL)) && But this is equivalent to: if ( (is_rt_policy(policy) && has_rt_policy(p)) && which means something different. We can't _decrease_ the current ->rt_priority with such a check (if rlim[RLIMIT_RTPRIO] == 0). Probably, it was supposed to be: if ( !(policy == SCHED_NORMAL && p->policy == SCHED_BATCH) && !(policy == SCHED_BATCH && p->policy == SCHED_NORMAL) this matches the comment, but strange: it doesn't allow to _drop_ the realtime priority when rlim[RLIMIT_RTPRIO] == 0. I think the right check would be: /* can't set/change rt policy */ if (is_rt_policy(policy) && policy != p->policy && !rlim_rtprio) return -EPERM; Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
57a6f51c42
commit
8dc3e9099e
@ -4116,27 +4116,25 @@ int sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
|
||||
* Allow unprivileged RT tasks to decrease priority:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
|
||||
unsigned long rlim_rtprio;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
if (is_rt_policy(policy)) {
|
||||
unsigned long rlim_rtprio;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!lock_task_sighand(p, &flags))
|
||||
return -ESRCH;
|
||||
rlim_rtprio = p->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_RTPRIO].rlim_cur;
|
||||
unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
|
||||
if (!lock_task_sighand(p, &flags))
|
||||
return -ESRCH;
|
||||
rlim_rtprio = p->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_RTPRIO].rlim_cur;
|
||||
unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
|
||||
|
||||
/* can't set/change the rt policy */
|
||||
if (policy != p->policy && !rlim_rtprio)
|
||||
return -EPERM;
|
||||
|
||||
/* can't increase priority */
|
||||
if (param->sched_priority > p->rt_priority &&
|
||||
param->sched_priority > rlim_rtprio)
|
||||
return -EPERM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* can't change policy, except between SCHED_NORMAL
|
||||
* and SCHED_BATCH:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (((policy != SCHED_NORMAL && p->policy != SCHED_BATCH) &&
|
||||
(policy != SCHED_BATCH && p->policy != SCHED_NORMAL)) &&
|
||||
!rlim_rtprio)
|
||||
return -EPERM;
|
||||
/* can't increase priority */
|
||||
if (is_rt_policy(policy) &&
|
||||
param->sched_priority > p->rt_priority &&
|
||||
param->sched_priority > rlim_rtprio)
|
||||
return -EPERM;
|
||||
/* can't change other user's priorities */
|
||||
if ((current->euid != p->euid) &&
|
||||
(current->euid != p->uid))
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user