luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[POWERPC] spufs: fix typos in sched.c comments

Browse Source 
Fix a few typos in the spufs scheduler comments

Signed-off-by: Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmerino@ac.upc.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
This commit is contained in:
Julio M. Merino Vidal 2007-12-20 16:39:59 +09:00 committed by Paul Mackerras
parent c25620d766
commit 9b1d21f858
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
View File

@ -105,15 +105,15 @@ void spu_set_timeslice(struct spu_context *ctx)
void __spu_update_sched_info(struct spu_context *ctx)
{
/*
* 32-Bit assignment are atomic on powerpc, and we don't care about
* memory ordering here because retriving the controlling thread is
* per defintion racy.
* 32-Bit assignments are atomic on powerpc, and we don't care about
* memory ordering here because retrieving the controlling thread is
* per definition racy.
*/
ctx->tid = current->pid;
/*
* We do our own priority calculations, so we normally want
* ->static_prio to start with. Unfortunately thies field
* ->static_prio to start with. Unfortunately this field
* contains junk for threads with a realtime scheduling
* policy so we have to look at ->prio in this case.
*/
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ void __spu_update_sched_info(struct spu_context *ctx)
* A lot of places that don't hold list_mutex poke into
* cpus_allowed, including grab_runnable_context which
* already holds the runq_lock. So abuse runq_lock
* to protect this field aswell.
* to protect this field as well.
*/
spin_lock(&spu_prio->runq_lock);
ctx->cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed;
@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static void notify_spus_active(void)
* Wake up the active spu_contexts.
*
* When the awakened processes see their "notify_active" flag is set,
* they will call spu_switch_notify();
* they will call spu_switch_notify().
*/
for_each_online_node(node) {
struct spu *spu;
@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static struct spu *find_victim(struct spu_context *ctx)
/*
* Look for a possible preemption candidate on the local node first.
* If there is no candidate look at the other nodes. This isn't
* exactly fair, but so far the whole spu schedule tries to keep
* exactly fair, but so far the whole spu scheduler tries to keep
* a strong node affinity. We might want to fine-tune this in
* the future.
*/
@ -905,7 +905,7 @@ static int show_spu_loadavg(struct seq_file *s, void *private)
/*
* Note that last_pid doesn't really make much sense for the
* SPU loadavg (it even seems very odd on the CPU side..),
* SPU loadavg (it even seems very odd on the CPU side...),
* but we include it here to have a 100% compatible interface.
*/
seq_printf(s, "%d.%02d %d.%02d %d.%02d %ld/%d %d\n",