From 9dc5d569c133819c1ce069ebb1d771c62de32580 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yinghai Lu Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:39:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_reserve_range/memblock_x86_free_range They are wrappers for core versions, which take start/end/name instead of base/size. This will make x86 conversion eaasier. could add more debug print out -v2: change get_max_mapped() to memblock.default_alloc_limit according to Michael Ellerman and Ben change to memblock_x86_reserve_range and memblock_x86_free_range according to Michael Ellerman -v3: call check_and_double after reserve/free, so could avoid to use find_memblock_area. Suggested by Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin --- arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h | 3 +++ arch/x86/mm/memblock.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h index 69cf853e9319..e11ddf059fa1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h @@ -6,4 +6,7 @@ u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align); void memblock_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end); +void memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name); +void memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end); + #endif diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c index 8101084d452a..9829eaf1dbda 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c @@ -114,3 +114,25 @@ void __init memblock_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end) memblock_reserve_reserved_regions(); } #endif + +void __init memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name) +{ + if (start == end) + return; + + if (WARN_ONCE(start > end, "memblock_x86_reserve_range: wrong range [%#llx, %#llx]\n", start, end)) + return; + + memblock_reserve(start, end - start); +} + +void __init memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end) +{ + if (start == end) + return; + + if (WARN_ONCE(start > end, "memblock_x86_free_range: wrong range [%#llx, %#llx]\n", start, end)) + return; + + memblock_free(start, end - start); +}