luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use locking in intel_pstate_resume()

Browse Source 
Theoretically, intel_pstate_resume() may be executed in parallel
with intel_pstate_set_policy(), if the latter is invoked via
cpufreq_update_policy() as a result of a notification, so use
intel_pstate_limits_lock in there too to avoid race conditions.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Rafael J. Wysocki 2016-12-30 15:56:14 +01:00
parent 366430b5c2
commit aa439248ab
1 changed files with 9 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
View File

@ -914,12 +914,20 @@ static int intel_pstate_hwp_save_state(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static int intel_pstate_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
int ret;
if (!hwp_active)
return 0;
mutex_lock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock);
all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]->epp_policy = 0;
return intel_pstate_hwp_set_policy(policy);
ret = intel_pstate_hwp_set_policy(policy);
mutex_unlock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock);
return ret;
}
static void intel_pstate_hwp_set_online_cpus(void)