sched,fair: Alternative sched_slice()
[ Upstream commit 0c2de3f054a59f15e01804b75a04355c48de628c ] The current sched_slice() seems to have issues; there's two possible things that could be improved: - the 'nr_running' used for __sched_period() is daft when cgroups are considered. Using the RQ wide h_nr_running seems like a much more consistent number. - (esp) cgroups can slice it real fine, which makes for easy over-scheduling, ensure min_gran is what the name says. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210412102001.611897312@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
94902ee299
commit
ae7fe4794d
|
@ -700,7 +700,13 @@ static u64 __sched_period(unsigned long nr_running)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
static u64 sched_slice(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u64 slice = __sched_period(cfs_rq->nr_running + !se->on_rq);
|
||||
unsigned int nr_running = cfs_rq->nr_running;
|
||||
u64 slice;
|
||||
|
||||
if (sched_feat(ALT_PERIOD))
|
||||
nr_running = rq_of(cfs_rq)->cfs.h_nr_running;
|
||||
|
||||
slice = __sched_period(nr_running + !se->on_rq);
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
|
||||
struct load_weight *load;
|
||||
|
@ -717,6 +723,10 @@ static u64 sched_slice(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
|
|||
}
|
||||
slice = __calc_delta(slice, se->load.weight, load);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (sched_feat(BASE_SLICE))
|
||||
slice = max(slice, (u64)sysctl_sched_min_granularity);
|
||||
|
||||
return slice;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -90,3 +90,6 @@ SCHED_FEAT(WA_BIAS, true)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
SCHED_FEAT(UTIL_EST, true)
|
||||
SCHED_FEAT(UTIL_EST_FASTUP, true)
|
||||
|
||||
SCHED_FEAT(ALT_PERIOD, true)
|
||||
SCHED_FEAT(BASE_SLICE, true)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user