mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: Check for error num after setting mask

commit 40c67c291a93f8846c4a972c9ef1b7ba4544c8d0 upstream.

Because of the possible failure of the dma_supported(), the
dma_set_mask_and_coherent() may return error num.
Therefore, it should be better to check it and return the error if
fails.
And since the sdhci_setup_host() has already checked the return value of
the enable_dma, we need not check it in sdhci_resume_host() again.

Fixes: 5552d7ad59 ("mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: set proper dma mask for ls104x chips")
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220112083156.1124782-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jiasheng Jiang 2022-01-12 16:31:56 +08:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 8027ba480c
commit c9cc027c55

View File

@ -524,12 +524,16 @@ static void esdhc_of_adma_workaround(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
static int esdhc_of_enable_dma(struct sdhci_host *host)
{
int ret;
u32 value;
struct device *dev = mmc_dev(host->mmc);
if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1043a-esdhc") ||
of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc"))
dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40));
of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc")) {
ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40));
if (ret)
return ret;
}
value = sdhci_readl(host, ESDHC_DMA_SYSCTL);