rxrpc: Use rxrpc_free_skb() rather than rxrpc_lose_skb()
rxrpc_lose_skb() is now exactly the same as rxrpc_free_skb(), so remove it and use the latter instead. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6f41617bf2
commit
d2944b1c66
|
@ -1095,7 +1095,6 @@ void rxrpc_new_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
|
|||
void rxrpc_see_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
|
||||
void rxrpc_get_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
|
||||
void rxrpc_free_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
|
||||
void rxrpc_lose_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
|
||||
void rxrpc_purge_queue(struct sk_buff_head *);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ void rxrpc_data_ready(struct sock *udp_sk)
|
|||
static int lose;
|
||||
if ((lose++ & 7) == 7) {
|
||||
trace_rxrpc_rx_lose(sp);
|
||||
rxrpc_lose_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_rx_lost);
|
||||
rxrpc_free_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_rx_lost);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -68,21 +68,6 @@ void rxrpc_free_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, enum rxrpc_skb_trace op)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Note the injected loss of a socket buffer.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void rxrpc_lose_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, enum rxrpc_skb_trace op)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const void *here = __builtin_return_address(0);
|
||||
if (skb) {
|
||||
int n;
|
||||
CHECK_SLAB_OKAY(&skb->users);
|
||||
n = atomic_dec_return(select_skb_count(op));
|
||||
trace_rxrpc_skb(skb, op, refcount_read(&skb->users), n, here);
|
||||
kfree_skb(skb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Clear a queue of socket buffers.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user