regulator: st-pwm: Convert to get_voltage_sel
Also remove test for selector in st_pwm_regulator_set_voltage_sel, the checking is already done in .list_voltage. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4a5d301328
commit
d8eb6fa7a9
@ -39,11 +39,11 @@ struct st_pwm_voltages {
|
||||
unsigned int dutycycle;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int st_pwm_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *dev)
|
||||
static int st_pwm_regulator_get_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct st_pwm_regulator_data *drvdata = rdev_get_drvdata(dev);
|
||||
|
||||
return drvdata->pdata->duty_cycle_table[drvdata->state].uV;
|
||||
return drvdata->state;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int st_pwm_regulator_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *dev,
|
||||
@ -53,9 +53,6 @@ static int st_pwm_regulator_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *dev,
|
||||
int dutycycle;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (selector >= dev->desc->n_voltages)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
dutycycle = (ST_PWM_REG_PERIOD / 100) *
|
||||
drvdata->pdata->duty_cycle_table[selector].dutycycle;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -92,7 +89,7 @@ static int st_pwm_regulator_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *dev,
|
||||
|
||||
static struct regulator_ops st_pwm_regulator_voltage_ops = {
|
||||
.set_voltage_sel = st_pwm_regulator_set_voltage_sel,
|
||||
.get_voltage = st_pwm_regulator_get_voltage,
|
||||
.get_voltage_sel = st_pwm_regulator_get_voltage_sel,
|
||||
.list_voltage = st_pwm_regulator_list_voltage,
|
||||
.map_voltage = regulator_map_voltage_iterate,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user